RIP Bolt-01.
Thank you
Thank you
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Show posts MenuQuote from: repoman on 05 April, 2020, 05:26:09 PM
Hi all.
I've mentioned my site on here before but I've just finished my bibliography of all Judge Death comic story appearances. Every story has been written up with a couple of scans at least on the vast majority of them.
http://judgedeath.co.uk/bibliography
I'll stop spamming it now but just wanted to let the community on here know that it's as complete as I can get it until any other stories get published. And thanks to those of you who have helped me track down stories, engaged on the help thread and liked/retweeted things on Twitter. I appreciate all the support.
Quote from: Dog Deever on 20 August, 2010, 09:32:46 PMQuoteYou do understand how wiki or in fact any encyclopedia works, right? ....
Though I do not hold a degree and have never attempted to try, i understand this.
Passive aggressive abuse- trying to sneakily call me stupid. This is pretty offensive stuff, stop bullying me.
Sob sob, where's my mammy or a mod.
( )
Quote from: Dog Deever on 20 August, 2010, 09:32:46 PMQuote2. It is repeated over time.
my point exactly. Once instance doesn't equal bullying. Bullying is sustained. Saying someone is being a dick implies that it isn't always the case, only 'in this instance'. Saying someone is a dick implies they are always a dick.
TBH yes it does. Once or many times such name calling can be considered an act of bullying the article I quoted says "There are various types of bullying, but most have three things in common" and then lists those three things but that does not limit the definition of bullying behavior. I know this because I am a Union Rep and have had to deal with cases that involve bullying. from individuals to groups of people and even if you only do it once you still have done it.Quote from: Dog Deever on 20 August, 2010, 09:32:46 PMQuoteAnd no, I don't take wikipedia as the be all and all of facts. Nor does any academic establishment, regardless of how much wiki fans defend it.
and you are quite right to not use it as the only source of information Even the Encyclopedia Britannica has mistakes and incorrect information because information changes over time. however accusing me of editing the page out of hand for the benefit of making my point , with no proof I might add, was IMO a bit off. If you where being flippant then i missed the humor.Quote from: Dog Deever on 20 August, 2010, 09:32:46 PMQuoteAnd yes, I understand many things. You do understand that this isn't a debating society right? It is an informal forum about the 2000ad comic, and we don't necessarily have to conform to your (or the debating societies) idea of how things should be discussed.
as I said, my response was due to the insinuation that I had edited the Wiki page.
And yes, I do understand that this is not a debating society. My point was if some one states that they are engaged in discussion, testing opinions and reasoning on a discussion forum then they should know that however vigorous the discussion then making inflammatory statements is to walk a very fine line. making the simile to male genitalia is well over that line.
If Jim needs to take a time out, fine. That is an very adult thing to do.
But perhaps he should of taken a quiet step back rather than making a grandiose announcement about being here less. Just a thought.