Quote from: Jo-L on 16 November, 2013, 06:07:14 AM
I'm really looking forward to this. Year One and Mars Attacks were good, but the main series has dropped off a bit. This looks like it could get the IDW series back on track.
Agreed!
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Show posts MenuQuote from: Jo-L on 16 November, 2013, 06:07:14 AM
I'm really looking forward to this. Year One and Mars Attacks were good, but the main series has dropped off a bit. This looks like it could get the IDW series back on track.
Quote from: COMMANDO FORCES on 15 September, 2012, 08:10:14 PM
At first glance I thought the Stallone one was a very bad waxwork
Quote from: MIKE COLLINS on 15 September, 2012, 06:15:47 PMThe adaptation of DUNE by Bill Sienkiewicz has to be seen to be believed.
Quote from: Professah Byah on 26 July, 2012, 05:24:45 PM
So the finale hinged on the fact that [spoiler]some days you just can't get rid of a bomb[/spoiler]?
Quote from: Jim_Campbell on 26 July, 2012, 10:45:25 AMQuote from: Richmond Clements on 26 July, 2012, 10:33:27 AM
I'll need to watch it again, but I certainly did not see his actions as callous or a stooge. He has, as you said, been trying to contact Wayne about the problems. Not stooge like behaviour, I think!
I got the impression that it was the focus on the [spoiler]reactor programme and its moth-balling[/spoiler] that crippled Wayne Industries' finances; that the [spoiler]diversion of funds absorbed profit in ways Lucius couldn't explain to the board[/spoiler] and I took the 'not answering your e-mails' line to be more of a refusal on Bruce's part to discuss [spoiler]the decision to mothball the reactor[/spoiler] than half-hearted attempt by Lucius to flag up an eight-year programme of mismanagement of the company.
That said, I've only seen the film once and this wasn't foremost in the things I was paying attention to, so I may have that wrong.
Quote from: Richmond Clements on 26 July, 2012, 10:33:27 AMQuote from: hoops on 26 July, 2012, 10:30:12 AMI'll need to watch it again, but I certainly did not see his actions as callous or a stooge. He has, as you said, been trying to contact Wayne about the problems. Not stooge like behaviour, I think!Quote from: Richmond Clements on 26 July, 2012, 10:27:40 AM
There's a difference between breaking into a building in which he (presumably) designed the security for, and buying enough shares to be a majority shareholder on the board of a multinational company.
And visiting an old friend...?
My point being - Lucius shows over the first two films that he is no callous moron or anyone else's stooge...so why have him act like one all of a sudden.
Quote from: Richmond Clements on 26 July, 2012, 10:27:40 AM
There's a difference between breaking into a building in which he (presumably) designed the security for, and buying enough shares to be a majority shareholder on the board of a multinational company.
Quote from: Richmond Clements on 26 July, 2012, 10:21:00 AM
The board managed to get rid of him in the first movie - it was only the eventual intervention of Bruce Wayne, through duplicitous methods, that got him back in.
Quote from: Richmond Clements on 26 July, 2012, 10:11:52 AMQuotethe same kind of character development is found in Lucius deciding to allow the Wayne money to disappear over eight years without even taking the time to visit Bruce or Alfred in person
Does it say he never visited? I can't recall...
Also, he's only one of a board of directors. The board was[spoiler] being manipulated by [/spoiler] old fella-my-lad (can't remember his name) who was [spoiler]in cahoots with Bane[/spoiler].
Quote from: Richmond Clements on 26 July, 2012, 08:59:12 AMInteresting...so he deserted Bruce to allow Bruce to get back into the game...not because he felt Bruce had reached certain limitations and wasn't prpared to watch him fail, as he suspected Bruce wished to do?Quote from: hoops on 26 July, 2012, 08:45:15 AMAlfred did what he had to do to get Bruce back in the game. He knew he was sacrificing his relationship by doing so, but his love for Bruce was such that he was prepared to take the fallout.
Bruce Wayne: You still haven't given up on me?
Alfred Pennyworth: Never!
...well, until part three that is, when you really need me...[spoiler]and then i'll leave, and when you 'die'... i'll cry because i've let your father down.[/spoiler]
Because that's the faithful Alfred Pennyworth we all know and love.
That, to me, is as faithful and loyal a friend as you could have.
Quote from: JOE SOAP on 26 July, 2012, 09:05:10 AMQuote from: hoops on 26 July, 2012, 08:45:15 AM
Because that's the faithful Alfred Pennyworth we all know and love.
He's not an automaton. I don't see anything wrong with characters developing or doing things 'out of character' in certain situations, lfe tends to be like that too. They even do it in comics y'know.