Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 

Author Topic: Hitchhikers Trailer  (Read 3989 times)

Conexus

  • Member
  • Battle Hardened War Robot
  • ****
  • Posts: 2636
    • View Profile
Re: Hitchhikers Trailer
« Reply #15 on: 17 February, 2005, 12:07:56 AM »
no, i mean there's no link on amazon (for me , anyway)

Noisybast

  • Member
  • Bionic Fingers
  • *****
  • Posts: 6389
  • It's all the deep end.
    • View Profile
    • http://www.mattnicholson.co.uk
Re: Hitchhikers Trailer
« Reply #16 on: 17 February, 2005, 12:27:01 AM »
You do know you can pick a decent sound card up for around twenty quid, don't you...?

opaque

  • Member
  • Evil Cyborg
  • ****
  • Posts: 2248
    • View Profile
    • CAF Gallery
Re: Hitchhikers Trailer
« Reply #17 on: 17 February, 2005, 12:48:55 AM »
Not sure about Zaphods accent (at the end) but god they've put one HELL of a lot of work into that. Those effects look amazing but somehow believable.

Conexus

  • Member
  • Battle Hardened War Robot
  • ****
  • Posts: 2636
    • View Profile
Re: Hitchhikers Trailer
« Reply #18 on: 17 February, 2005, 12:56:57 AM »
Excuse me, i'm just off to cry in a corner, don't mind me :(

Bolt-01

  • Global Moderator
  • CALL-ME-KENNETH!
  • *****
  • Posts: 11260
  • It ain't called ZARJAZ fer nuthin'!
    • View Profile
    • FutureQuake Press
Re: Hitchhikers Trailer
« Reply #19 on: 17 February, 2005, 02:40:38 AM »
Tidy!

Looking forward to that now.

Bolt-01

WoD

  • Member
  • Battle Hardened War Robot
  • ****
  • Posts: 4600
    • View Profile
    • http://www.futurequake.co.uk/
Re: Hitchhikers Trailer
« Reply #20 on: 17 February, 2005, 02:44:46 AM »
wot he said

Bico

  • Member
  • Battle Hardened War Robot
  • ****
  • Posts: 3902
    • View Profile
Re: Hitchhikers Trailer
« Reply #21 on: 17 February, 2005, 03:28:27 AM »
I was looking forward to that a wee bit, but it seems terribly derivative and overly-reliant on slapstick from the trailer.  My faith in this has taken a bit of a knock, but I'll still probably go see it.

Devons Daddy

  • Member
  • Bionic Fingers
  • *****
  • Posts: 7353
    • View Profile
Re: Hitchhikers Trailer
« Reply #22 on: 17 February, 2005, 11:08:02 AM »
3rd arm and a hidden head which pops up now and then.
looking good as far as i can see,.

perhaps these scenes have been made based on the uproar that was noticed when they the orignal never had them. not hard to go back and make a few more scenes. add them in here and there.

another time this happened was sleeping with the enemy. Julie roberts, they had to change the end and add several more scenes to make her final act more plausible.
totally based on the feedback after test screenings.
but overall you look at the cast and think OH YES.
I AM VERY BUSY!
PJ Maybe and I use the same dictionary, live with it.

NO 2000ad no life!

Adrian Bamforth

  • 2000AD Creator
  • Battle Hardened War Robot
  • *****
  • Posts: 3362
    • View Profile
    • Adrian Bamforth, Artist
Re: Hitchhikers Trailer
« Reply #23 on: 17 February, 2005, 08:12:18 PM »
I always thought it would have been a good idea that if anyone was cast black it should be Zaphod - might be pandering to stereotypes but the beatnik hippy Zaphod is kind of outdated now though though I if played black he could be a more familiar egotistic rapper/Ali G/James Brown type (Red Dwarf yes I know). The trailer looks great (and I like the new Ford) though Zaphod  looks like a kind of messianic hippy.

ADE    

Adrian Bamforth

  • 2000AD Creator
  • Battle Hardened War Robot
  • *****
  • Posts: 3362
    • View Profile
    • Adrian Bamforth, Artist
Re: Hitchhikers Trailer
« Reply #24 on: 17 February, 2005, 08:43:17 PM »
By the way, in  case anyone hasn't noticed, this is from the precociously talented Irving droid:

opaque

  • Member
  • Evil Cyborg
  • ****
  • Posts: 2248
    • View Profile
    • CAF Gallery
Re: Hitchhikers Trailer
« Reply #25 on: 18 February, 2005, 02:56:34 AM »
I've been listening to that at work the last 2 days (hey got to do some work as well) and I was wondering why the artwork looked familiar!!!
Thanks.