Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 

Author Topic: Why is 2000AD and the Meg so childish?  (Read 5926 times)

Queen Firey-Bou

  • Member
  • Bionic Fingers
  • *****
  • Posts: 7605
    • View Profile
    • http://www.balnacra.com
Re: Why is 2000AD and the Meg so c...
« Reply #105 on: 15 March, 2004, 06:25:44 pm »
ha that sounds about right.

The only difference tween men & boys is the size & price of the toys.

course i'm a woman so i get away with doing stufflike wearing a pokemon t-shirt, because somehow on an old lady, its not childish, it must be a cult thing. ha ha, yeah whatever.

Oddboy

  • Member
  • CALL-ME-KENNETH!
  • *****
  • Posts: 10125
    • View Profile
Re: Why is 2000AD and the Meg so c...
« Reply #106 on: 15 March, 2004, 06:40:00 pm »
Fix that link for you Duds...


Also Gavin, if you're watching, this week's FS was by Richard McTighe not Si Spurrier!

Link: www.2000adreview.co.uk

Better set your phaser to stun.

JimBob

  • Member
  • Posting Machine
  • ***
  • Posts: 1021
    • View Profile
Re: Why is 2000AD and the Meg so c...
« Reply #107 on: 16 March, 2004, 03:31:12 am »
GB, I didn't mention Bova because I've never read any of his work, "hard" sci-fi was a phase I went through years ago and I don't really enjoy it anymore.
Interestingly I agree with your choice of quality Dredd Stories, I just think theres room for both types of tale, and D'israli has really invigorated the tooth stable for me over the last few years.

Jim