Dredd (2012)

COMMANDO FORCES · 28 April, 2014, 09:47:21 PM

And you know what that info confirms

JOE SOAP · 28 April, 2014, 09:50:28 PM

Quote from: COMMANDO FORCES on 28 April, 2014, 09:47:21 PM
And you know what that info confirms

Well I wouldn't be so bold as to suggest such a thing...

COMMANDO FORCES · 28 April, 2014, 10:15:08 PM

I was just going to say that those dead and background characters won't be back

COMMANDO FORCES · 30 April, 2014, 02:32:27 AM

Make of this what you will...

DREDD LEGO - SHORT FILM

MR. ELIMINATOR · 30 April, 2014, 07:58:09 AM

Have the other 66 of those behind the scenes pics been uploaded yet?

Steve Green · 30 April, 2014, 09:12:30 PM

No, not yet - I will post here when they are uploaded.

JOE SOAP · 30 April, 2014, 10:52:39 PM

Bay City Roller Adi Shankar mentions that thing.

COMMANDO FORCES · 01 May, 2014, 12:07:25 AM

Loved his sign off!

shaolin_monkey · 01 May, 2014, 12:27:16 AM

Quote from: COMMANDO FORCES on 01 May, 2014, 12:07:25 AM
Loved his sign off!

That kid's too cool for school.

Frank · 01 May, 2014, 08:26:00 AM

Quote from: JOE SOAP on 30 April, 2014, 10:52:39 PM
Bay City Roller Adi Shankar mentions that thing.

He's like a wee Chihuahua peeking out of a tartan shopping trolley. A lesser man than yourself would have pointed out that the primary obstacle Shankar cites to another film being made is exactly that which you guessed months ago - that the distribution rights to any putative sequel rest with different companies in every territory and would have to be (re)negotiated on an individual basis.

TordelBack · 01 May, 2014, 08:53:36 AM

What a great guy! Very heartening stuff.

Goaty · 01 May, 2014, 08:59:16 AM

Wish for subtitles there...

Nice signing off

plus he looks like that bloke from Scott Pilgrim Vs The World

dracula1 · 03 May, 2014, 12:12:06 AM

The poor guy seems abit disheartened by it all. He has a vision about how to approach this sequel successfully but is surrounded by numerous fuckups (in suits) that keep sticking spanners in the works.

Jim_Campbell · 03 May, 2014, 12:25:47 AM

It's not really the fuck ups in suits that are the problem, is it? It's the multi-million dollar loss on a piece of IP that tanked at the box office once when the movie was unfaithful to the source material, then tanked a second time when it WAS faithful to the source material. That's a no-win, right there.

Loving the source material isn't enough -- it's convincing the people with the money who DON'T love it that they should pony up tens of millions of dollars on a franchise that's failed twice.

That's hard sell.

Cheers

Jim

IAMTHESYSTEM · 03 May, 2014, 10:14:20 AM

Yep if a Film doesn't make a profit, or make it's money back it's seen to be to risky to chuck squillions of dollars at it again. So the grim arithmetic says No to a DREDD sequel. >sniff<