Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - The Enigmatic Dr X

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 391
Film & TV / Re: Last movie watched...
« on: 15 October, 2021, 01:19:24 PM »
I haven't decided whether I should revisit the Hellraiser franchise.

Watch the first one and then leave it at that!

Hellraiser 2 is a fantastic film, a direct sequel written by Barker.

Games / Re: Last game played...
« on: 29 September, 2021, 03:01:59 PM »
I have invested in FIFA 22. I will be playing this until 2023.

Film & TV / Re: Y the Last Man on Disney+
« on: 15 September, 2021, 09:56:58 PM »
Just been to the UK premier of Disney+'s new show Y the Last Man based on  Brian K. Vaughan and Pia Guerra 2002-08 Vertigo comic of the same name set in a post-apocalyptic world where a mysterious cataclysmic event simultaneously killed every mammal with a Y chromosome but for one man, Yorick Brown

The first 3 episodes will be released of 22nd September with the other episodes being released every  Wednesday.

Not much happens in the first episode as it is just setting up the world and the characters just before the men all die, but it is well acted feels like it is going to be a good series

One man and his monkey, surely?

Other Reviews / Re: Thirteenth Floor Vol. 3
« on: 14 September, 2021, 11:57:18 AM »
I've got this and Stainless Steel Rat, but they're Christmas presents for one of my kids. Honest.

Film & TV / Re: Last movie watched...
« on: 08 September, 2021, 07:25:23 PM »
I watched Infinity War and Endgame back-to-back and it's not clear why the second one would be regarded as so woeful compared to the first.

I mean, I think its awful in MANY capacities beyond its comparisons to Infinity War (a thoroughly mediocre is enjoyable experience) due to just how thuddingly, blindingly, dreary and tiresome it is as a piece of "art"* unto itself.

*I use this term with the loosest of meanings when it comes to the house of mouse.

I know i often use things like "More like AVENGERS: SHITGAME" as shorthand myself but these are pretty broad brush strokes. Any chance of an example of "dreary" or "tiresome"?

I mean I certainly think some of the set pieces could be trimmed for time especially if there are beats in there for characters I'm not particularly engaged with but "dreary" and "tiresome" I just don't get. Genuinely curious.

I can see what he means. There is an element of spectacle for spectacle's sake, and at the cost of the plot being driven forward.

BUT these are comic book adaptions. The action is therefore intrinsic to them, and I don't feel they should be criticised for it any more than you could criticise a western for having shots of a cowboy on a horse. You know what you are getting into when you sit down to watch one.

I may not be articulating that properly. It's kinda like saying a steak is too beefy. It is what it is. Don't chow down and expect something else, and definitely don't if you are a vegetarian.

I do feel, as I have said, that these movies are guilty pleasures and like a fish supper - tasty but with instant regret and a sickly feeling.

For me, I admire the technical skill in showing a photo-realistic representation of what comics and my imagination have thrown up for decades. But I also have a slightly guilty feeling that the Marvel movies cost so much, and say so little.

So, yes, I can see how they may be tiresome and dreary. They are noise and fury with nothing to say, and that can be wearing. Like watching fireworks for six hours. It's fun at the start, but soon the booms, bangs and fancy lights are... dull.

That image of Dredd by Mick McMahon, is it from a Judge Dredd musical? Looks like he's dancing. Quite poor pose.


Anderson, too

Film & TV / Re: Last movie watched...
« on: 01 September, 2021, 08:07:19 AM »
I don't think that could be considered a spoiler seeing as how he has the same name and it's the same actress playing his mother.

I've not even seen the film, so sorry if it's a spoiler. I've just seen the BBC review saying, "this is a sequel to the original, ignoring the other sequels, with Actor X playing the child from the first film". The BBC review said it was pretty damn good.

Film & TV / Re: Last movie watched...
« on: 31 August, 2021, 05:43:54 PM »

I'll enjoy watching the remake hopefully but I reckon I'll leave OG Candyman for another 10-20 years.

The 2021 film is a sequel to the original, y'know. The main character is the baby from the original.

Events / Re: Best of 2000AD #1 signing
« on: 24 August, 2021, 11:10:03 PM »
without the Hachette gouging.
Why do you say ‘gouging’?

I feel it's a never-ending saga and my fear of incompletion means I'd be compelled to buy them all, even the duff ones that these kind of things use to pad out the collection. Whereas, for reasons that I know are really baseless, a comic just feels better.

In typing that, I realise my feeling is baseless, but it also how I feel. It's like the Hachette collections are like those £30 a month model sets that seem to never end

Events / Re: Best of 2000AD #1 signing
« on: 20 August, 2021, 10:43:18 PM »
Always a sad jolt to see a Bolt post.

I'm not sure whether to say that or not. Or if it's disrespectful to then move on to a comment. Sorry if I upset anyone. I am really unsure of the etiquette.

Anyway, I would like to buy this. Even though I have a full collection, I am too lazy and would like curated gems without the Hachette gouging.

Film & TV / Re: Last movie watched...
« on: 20 August, 2021, 01:03:12 PM »

General / Re: 2000AD ...in 1988!
« on: 19 August, 2021, 03:06:46 PM »
My Grud, was that really 33 years ago?  Also, I had to do a double-take when I saw John Higgins' Rogue cover. 
 Jesus, put it back in your pants, Rogue... oh, wait.

I've never noticed that before, but once seen it can't be unseen.

Megazine / Re: Meg 435 - Waugh In Hell
« on: 17 August, 2021, 10:15:39 PM »
Oops. The bold bit was meant to be a spoiler

Megazine / Meg 435 - Waugh In Hell
« on: 17 August, 2021, 10:07:33 PM »
Got my Meg, and there's no thread!

All a bit bland for me, but Angelic is fun and Waugh redeems it. Which, when you read it, is ironic... as hell.

So, what do we have:


This feels a bit like one of those stories where there's a threat of retaliation from another city and then it fades away. I hope not, but I honestly don't know if it's over or not. That can't be a good thing. And there's a fight which could have been a bit more Stan-Lee but is very perfunctory. Jury is out on this. Which can't be good, when the same jury is judge and executioner. Art feels a bit rushed too, especially the last two pages.


I feel this is too low key to grab my attention. It's a nice tale of Brit Cit's underbelly, and it's Dredd-world. But it's neither a high-octane thriller nor a character piece and suffers a bit for it.


This is fun. Nice judge at the end; not sure if this is alternate world or origin story, but I likes it.


I can't wait for this to end. It's confusing, random and seems to go nowhere. I can't tell the characters apart, the fact they were dead seems irrelevant, and for folks who have been through so much they are just too trusting. Haven't they seen any horror film ever?


This is the most fun thing in the Meg in ages. No spoilers, but the change in demeanour makes me think there is a Plan and I am enjoying it being unspooled. I look forward to seeing Devlin in hell - the mind boggles, dear boy!

Off Topic / Re: It's a bit warm/ wet/ cold outside
« on: 16 August, 2021, 09:19:27 PM »

 The times where scientists determined that we live in repeating cold and warm circles has ended.

No one "determined" that. It wasn't a decision, but what happened. Until we screwed the temperature of the planet.

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 391