Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Could I safely take you never heard for alchemists?
I have right to pick up what I dislike, that definitely isn't going to be a witch. Which, I am sure existed then, but weren't called witches.
(And, FWIW, although Grover has a Punjabi origin, it also exists as an Anglicisation of Gruber.)
It's quite ironic how much fandom's all in a frenzy over Ken Niemand being a pen-name. Because, and I realize this may not be obvious, my real name doesn't rhyme with [Scunthorpe].
Farcebookers are bound to be a bit more upset because so many of them use actual factual monikers. Plus, the MAGAverse hierarchy have a long-running grudge with Rennie (I was shown that they're currently posting art of him as a grotesque slime monster) and are obsessed with their pet theory of him being Niemand.
Don't know about MAGA, but apparently many buy that Rennie is Niemand thanks to Mills' tweet.
Dark Angel (Shevaun Haldane), originally Hell's Angel, is a fictional superheroine from the Marvel Comics imprint Marvel UK. She first appeared in Hell's Angel #1 (July 1992). The character and the comic book were both renamed to Dark Angel with issue #6 due to legal threats from the Hells Angels biker club. Their lawsuit was settled by Marvel agreeing to pay $35,000.00 as a charitable gift to Ronald McDonald House in the name of both Marvel and the Hell's Angels, in addition to renaming the character.
There's a curious thing about this site. 2000ad on Twitter have never once reacted in any way to any of the site's content. No likes, no retweets. Even when the tweet mentions to get a specific issue from their shop. But I've noticed they're usually quite active and happy to like/retweet other things by other people.
I'm not complaining in any way, they don't have to do anything. And it doesn't make any difference to me (although their support would get me a few more views I guess but that's not really going to change anything).
But it makes me wonder, are they against this sort of thing? They don't lose anything from the site being up and arguably it helps buyers know what progs/megs to get but it feels almost like company policy. As if fan-made sites aren't to be supported.
I could be wrong. Maybe they just think it's rubbish.
I'm not enticed by mention of 'the spy stuff' in volume 2. Will I miss anything if I skip straight to Vol 3?
But when Bill quotes something that happened 40 years ago, I see no relation with contemporary times (times changed since 1960s and 1970s).
What do you think?