I’m not watching a 12-minute video, but I scanned some salient bits and:
1. The news piece he has on the screen is full of old quotes.
2. He talks about it being a "real shame” and that everything is “full of bluster”.
On the first point, people are just regurgitating the same few quotes, which are:
• Urban will return to Dredd in any form, if asked, and if it’s viable
• Dredd 2 isn’t going to happen
• Garland does not want to return to Dredd on screen
And him saying nothing’s moved from Rebellion showcases a misunderstanding of how television moves (or, more likely, he may understand this but is nonetheless playing for clicks). TV can move quickly, but only when there’s a ton of money and sufficient impetus. If some billionaire really wanted Dredd on their telly, they could make it happen. But even then, you’re talking a turnaround in the many months. It takes, what, about 18 months to do a series of Doctor Who, which already has the infrastructure in place? So there’s your likely minimum ballpark for a ten-episode run when everything is already in place. But most telly – indeed, most movies – spend many years in pre-production.
So all we really know about the Mega-City One show is this: Rebellion want to make it, and Rob Williams has had some involvement. The end. That’s it. I’m sure if it gets any further along, the Kingsleys are hardly going to keep quiet about that. But when there’s no news, what’s the point in just repeating what’s already been said? (And, again, no news doesn’t mean it’s not going to happen.)