//ignore // Qualifying 1: 10 - James Peaty or Tony Luke

[Colin YNWA]

Well here we are, quite excited to be here the final face off in the first round of Qualifying - its all down hill from here OR does it get more interesting - lets see. Today we have a fascinating one, two writers that really divide opinion I suspect. So based on their writing for Tharg only who do you choice between:

James Peaty - http://www.2000ad.org/?zone=droid&page=profiles&choice=JAMESP (brilliantly updated by Cosh)

or

Tony Luke - https://shop.2000ad.com/creators/tony-luke strangely his Barney record is short so gone to the Shop scroll down and you can open all the series he's worked on.

Whose 2000ad writing do you prefer? Voting - just add a comment here with whose work you prefer (and anything else you might wish to say to discuss their work) closes sometime Wenesday 20th May?

What the heck is all this about? https://forums.2000ad.com/index.php?topic=46406.0

Final Qualifying 1 face off starts tomorrow...oh hold on no it won't ROUND 2 coming soon!

[TordelBack]

Not only is the late Tony Luke's Barney entry short, it also seems to confuse him with Tony Lee at points. The Albion wikibase thingy does a slightly better job.

I'll have to muse on my vote a bit longer in any event.

[broodblik]

Skip Tracer gets my vote , sorry meant to say James Peaty

[abelardsnazz]

I don't think I've read any of James Peaty's work so it's Tony Luke for me.

[Greg M.]

I had forgotten Luke co-wrote Wan Man an' His Dug, which I enjoyed a lot - on the basis of that, my vote is indeed Luke.

[Colin YNWA]

CLOSED

MODS COULD YOU LOCK THIS?

Sorry folks made a rubbish error that Tordelback has spotted I actually meant Tony Lee I'll start a new thread and hang my head in infinite shame.

[broodblik]

I demand a recount

[Colin YNWA]

I'd demand sacking the organising committee as its clearly rubbish!