Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 

Author Topic: anal retention  (Read 3455 times)

j

  • Member
  • Never Nude
  • Posts: 6
    • View Profile
anal retention
« on: 17 October, 2001, 02:56:48 AM »
Can anybody tell me the exact dimensions of 2000ad down through the progs and the prog numbers that it changed size at. Looking at the meg reprints I'm a bit confused.

Funt Solo

  • Member
  • Bionic Fingers
  • *****
  • Posts: 8873
  • Research Monkey
    • View Profile
Re: anal retention
« Reply #1 on: 24 July, 2020, 02:11:46 AM »
Sort of. But I've never measured them.

Dimensions A: progs 1-109; 128-499; 501-519
Dimensions B: progs 110-127
Dimensions C: 500
Dimensions D: 520-1199 (there may be further differences within that bracket)
Dimensions E: 1200-1370
Dimensions F: P2004 (or 1370.5) - present day.

Something like that.

Oh wait, look what I just found:

I kept info on the various formats when I was figuring out storage options a while back:

1 to 109240 x 280mm / 9.5 x 11in
110 to 127215 x 280mm / 8.5 x 11in
128 to 519240 x 280mm / 9.5 x 11in
520 to 1032230 x 300mm / 9 x 11.75in
1033 to 1199210 x 300mm / 8.25 x 11.75in
1200 to 1370195 x 300mm / 7.75 x 11.75in
1371 to present210 x 280mm / 8.25 x 11in

The sizes of the newsprint progs (pre 520) probably vary a little bit, as the folding and cutting of each prog was sometimes a bit erratic...
++ map ++ thrills ++ coma ++

Dandontdare

  • Member
  • CALL-ME-KENNETH!
  • *****
  • Posts: 10811
    • View Profile
Re: anal retention
« Reply #2 on: 24 July, 2020, 11:37:03 AM »
This was a necropost from 2001 that was bumped because it was spammed - it's gone now but it was just a link, no text - I almost clicked thinking it was a newly asked question and answer.

Colin YNWA

  • Member
  • CALL-ME-KENNETH!
  • *****
  • Posts: 18425
  • testing testing...
    • View Profile
Re: anal retention
« Reply #3 on: 24 July, 2020, 11:43:25 AM »
This was a necropost from 2001 that was bumped because it was spammed - it's gone now but it was just a link, no text - I almost clicked thinking it was a newly asked question and answer.

The title was just begging for some of our recent spam!

broodblik

  • Member
  • Battle Hardened War Robot
  • ****
  • Posts: 3609
  • watkykjy?
    • View Profile
Re: anal retention
« Reply #4 on: 24 July, 2020, 12:42:58 PM »
This was a necropost from 2001 that was bumped because it was spammed - it's gone now but it was just a link, no text - I almost clicked thinking it was a newly asked question and answer.

The title was just begging for some of our recent spam!

I almost did not read this thread as well. Lets not go too those dark places :(
Old age is the Lord’s way of telling us to step aside for something new. Death’s in case we didn’t take the hint.

The pen is mightier than the sword if the sword is very short, and the pen is very sharp.

Funt Solo

  • Member
  • Bionic Fingers
  • *****
  • Posts: 8873
  • Research Monkey
    • View Profile
Re: anal retention
« Reply #5 on: 24 July, 2020, 06:13:38 PM »
This was a necropost from 2001 that was bumped because it was spammed - it's gone now but it was just a link, no text - I almost clicked thinking it was a newly asked question and answer.

Trust me not to read the date! Still, I'm sure that 'j' from 2001 will be pleased to have received a comprehensive answer after his long, eminently patient, nineteen year wait (assuming he wasn't paying attention to the thread I quoted from 2017).

Could I have used my time more productively? Sure. But that's always been true.
++ map ++ thrills ++ coma ++