Main Menu
Menu

Show posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Show posts Menu

Messages - Eric Plumrose

#46
Film & TV / Re: Blade Runner 2
26 October, 2017, 09:05:54 PM
Saw it yesterday ('props' to Cineworld for actually presenting the film so that it wasn't just silhouettes talking throughout).

Thought it looked gorgeous, albeit in a kind of self-aware we're-making-a-sequel-to-BLADE-RUNNER-so-we-have-to kind of way. Ditto the soundtrack.

Enjoyed it more when it was being its own thing than a sequel but the indifferent narrative makes it hard to care (something Jim's also noted): K's investigating this but it's also that [spoiler]and it relates back to him or does it but obviously not because the movie's taking its time or maybe it does because it's taking its time . . .[/spoiler]

Annoyingly, of all the Judeo-Christian symbolism I clocked I can only remember [spoiler]the miracle birth[/spoiler] (natch), [spoiler]so it's more Joseph and Mary than Adam and Eve (but . . .)[/spoiler].

I'm also undecided if all the callbacks to the original were nuanced or just fan service. Again, I've forgotten pretty much all of them with the exception of the eye close-up and [spoiler]K looking at his hand every so often[/spoiler]. Bizarrely, I had the sudden realization halfway through that Robin Wright reminded me of Rutger Hauer.

There's some nice, underplayed humour [spoiler](an obviously incapable Deckard saying "We could do this all night or we could get a drink" and another scene I've forgotten)[/spoiler] and one misstep [spoiler](Joshi's head-drop on her desk after she's been killed)[/spoiler].

Would also have much preferred [spoiler]the miracle child's birth being a source of hope than an actual incentive to rebel[/spoiler], so overall . . . disappointing.
#47
Quote from: Mattofthespurs on 16 October, 2017, 06:03:36 PM
I get to watch the matches on TV but it's not the same.

Sorry to take this off on a tangent but no Spurs fan I've asked has ever been able to answer. What's with "Live! From White Hart Lane!" when the Spurs ground isn't actually on White Hart Lane?
#48
Music / Re: Best Cover Versions
09 October, 2017, 05:54:30 PM
Freestyler by the Bomfunk MC's. The OFFICIAL VIDEO for anyone wanting to compare it with BATTLEDRAGON's.

Symphonic version by Antonin Charvet
FUNKFARbl vs. Ninja Funt
Many Hands Play Piano
BATTLEDRAGON
and the awesome Kazakhstan Girls
#49
Film & TV / Re: Last movie watched...
08 October, 2017, 09:44:48 PM
Quote from: Modern Panther on 08 October, 2017, 09:23:09 PM
you get trans formed into an animal of your choosing

Just like Time Lords (and Ladies)!
#50
Film & TV / Re: Blade Runner 2
07 October, 2017, 12:42:35 PM
Cineworld will likely be the determining factor in my (not) seeing this at the flicks, so how much of the original's nocturnality permeates 2049?
#51
News / Re: Zenith returns in Prog 2050!
23 September, 2017, 08:38:09 PM
Quote from: JamesC on 23 September, 2017, 07:14:06 PM
I find it hard to understand why, if you're interested in 2000ad and its characters, you wouldn't be buying it currently.

In my case, disenchantment with comics in general. Which doesn't negate the not insignificant factificance that 2000 AD remains my favourite comic to this day*.





* As of this post, still 23 September, 2017.
#52
News / Re: Zenith returns in Prog 2050!
23 September, 2017, 08:23:08 PM
Quote from: TordelBack on 23 September, 2017, 06:56:40 PM
2000AD is bigger than any one year.

Quite. And even being a leap year, the year 2000 itself still managed only a paltry 366 days. As compared to the 14,819 days* Tharg's magnificent organ's been doing the rounds** .





* As of 23 September, 2017.

** How does he keep it up, you wonder? Plasticity.
#53
News / Re: Zenith returns in Prog 2050!
23 September, 2017, 06:28:01 PM
Quote from: Magnetica on 22 September, 2017, 01:29:41 PM
Maybe it's me, but I have never understood why you would be a member of a forum for a comic you don't read.

2000 AD has a forty-year publication history. Why should someone's squaxxship be dependent only on what's being published currently?
#54
Quote from: The Legendary Shark on 16 August, 2017, 06:48:03 AM
Holster with future manetivelcro. On foot, holster fututure maggnettovelcroes to hip; on bike, holster gets futury manetticalvelcroed to boot.

I'm outside the Patent Office as I type.
#55
Off Topic / Re: The Political Thread
16 August, 2017, 02:25:04 AM
Quote from: TordelBack on 16 August, 2017, 01:37:51 AM
Good Nazis, probably just out for an evening stroll in their fashionable swastika regalia.

Unless namechecked at Yad Vashem we'll just have to assume they have an architect's eye.
#56
Quote from: sheridan on 16 August, 2017, 01:00:12 AM
Boot holsters make more sense if you're on a bike though (and holsters attached to the waist make a bit less sense).

Which was the Squirrel's thinking exactly, IIRC. No reason a Judge's uniform couldn't also incorporate a hip-holster for performing those 59ds.
#57
Quote from: TordelBack on 16 August, 2017, 12:59:37 AM
When did it come in, was it (the rather excellent) Scorpion Swamp?

I recall being miffed a chum at school had an unribboned copy of ISLAND OF THE LIZARD KING so, yes. SCORPION SWAMP it probably was (a cursory search online of their respective covers seems to confirms this).
#58
Quote from: JOE SOAP on 06 August, 2017, 11:28:29 PM
During my FF days I got one of the Quest Packs for Christmas of '84.

1984? Yikes. By chance I picked up the Quest Pack in WHSmith while on holiday in Torquay. The only place I ever saw it.
#59
Quote from: SIP on 06 August, 2017, 05:44:23 PM
Anyway, just for fun!

I already had the first six books without it but, as a young Noxian, that green ribbon atop the cover drove me nuts when it was first introduced.