8873
« on: 05 October, 2003, 12:27:33 AM »
'...how those active in the anti-war protests deal with these ironies - such as how some wars, even illegal ones save more innocent lives than they cause'
Alright, I don't pretend to be the most politically aware person in the world, and I've only skimmed through this thread, but I'll throw in my shillingsworth.
I was on some anti-war protests during the Iraq war (which, we are told, has now ended). All this time, I believed the invasion of Iraq may lead to a better Iraq, and it may still do. I believe that the majority of Iraqis wanted the murderous despot Saddam out of power, and now he is. Although the country has descended into a state of near-anarchy, I believe that it may, eventually, become a better place to live than it was before the invasion.
However, I marched because that is not the reason Bush and Blair gave the world for going to war. I marched because I believe that the tragedy of 9/11 has been twisted and exploited to fool the majority of Americans (over two thirds, I think) into thinking Iraq had a part in the terrorist attacks on the US. I also believe that Bush and Rumsfeld pig-headedly defied and put into jeopardy the greatest aid to world peace we have, the U.N. (Alright, it's not perfect, but we have so far avoided a Third World War). Yes, even pre-emptive wars can be justified, but not by massive lies. If leaders tell us their wars are to liberate a country's people, they should try doing it before a war rather than after it.
I am prepared to change my mind, but only when those weapons of mass des-bleeding-struction are found.