9676
General / Re: Why is Army of Darkness consid...
« on: 07 March, 2005, 08:00:00 PM »
I think, because it's a sequel, it suffers harsher criticism.
For people looking for "more of the same", it didn't really deliver, as it's a completely different movie from I and II (themselves, of course, very similar).
Perhaps, to "the critics", it didn't work because it was more of an outright comedy than the previous movies.
The crucial difference, for me, is that Evil Dead I & II are tense and scary (whilst still being comedic in places) whereas Army of Darkness simply is not scary. It's gory, amusing, inventive and bizarre: but it's just not scary. For a horror movie, that's got to be a downside.
(Of course, it would be unfair to compare Alien and Aliens, as they are completely different sub-genres of sci-fi: horror and action respectively.)
For people looking for "more of the same", it didn't really deliver, as it's a completely different movie from I and II (themselves, of course, very similar).
Perhaps, to "the critics", it didn't work because it was more of an outright comedy than the previous movies.
The crucial difference, for me, is that Evil Dead I & II are tense and scary (whilst still being comedic in places) whereas Army of Darkness simply is not scary. It's gory, amusing, inventive and bizarre: but it's just not scary. For a horror movie, that's got to be a downside.
(Of course, it would be unfair to compare Alien and Aliens, as they are completely different sub-genres of sci-fi: horror and action respectively.)