Title: "But mum, it's actually good for me!" (warning: rude content)
Post by: longmanshort on 17 July, 2003, 03:20:09 PM
Post by: longmanshort on 17 July, 2003, 03:20:09 PM
Despite the fear of ridicule and for reasons that I shall keep to myself, this information makes me quite happy ...
Title: Re:
Post by: longmanshort on 17 July, 2003, 03:22:53 PM
Post by: longmanshort on 17 July, 2003, 03:22:53 PM
"If these findings hold up..."
fnarr fnarr
fnarr fnarr
Title: Re: Re:
Post by: Matt Timson on 17 July, 2003, 03:26:02 PM
Post by: Matt Timson on 17 July, 2003, 03:26:02 PM
Hurrah! Of course, it *does* mean that the likes of Mongo will probably live forever...
Title: Re: Re:
Post by: Wils on 17 July, 2003, 03:32:24 PM
Post by: Wils on 17 July, 2003, 03:32:24 PM
Thanks for that extremely disturbing mental picture. Ewww!
This is certainly good news for us blokes. Now what we need is a report about women being naturally zinc deficient...
This is certainly good news for us blokes. Now what we need is a report about women being naturally zinc deficient...
Title: Re: Re:
Post by: judge dreddd on 17 July, 2003, 04:41:18 PM
Post by: judge dreddd on 17 July, 2003, 04:41:18 PM
their is a lot of research that cancer is caused by stress and hence anything that reduces stress,tension etc. etc.
Title: Re: Re:
Post by: Richmond Clements on 17 July, 2003, 05:05:45 PM
Post by: Richmond Clements on 17 July, 2003, 05:05:45 PM
Excuse me, I have to go and...err... prevent cancer.
Title: Re: Re:
Post by: Danny Franks on 17 July, 2003, 05:15:08 PM
Post by: Danny Franks on 17 July, 2003, 05:15:08 PM
Hooray! (sound of one hand clapping)
Title: Re: Re:
Post by: judge dreddd on 17 July, 2003, 05:18:08 PM
Post by: judge dreddd on 17 July, 2003, 05:18:08 PM
i do not believe you really are here to help..nurse..
Title: Re: Re:
Post by: Proudhuff on 17 July, 2003, 06:38:20 PM
Post by: Proudhuff on 17 July, 2003, 06:38:20 PM
Always said the Aussies were a bunch of w****rs
Does this mean that scud mags now come(oooer Matron!) under 'Medical' in WHSmiths?
Huffy B-0
Does this mean that scud mags now come(oooer Matron!) under 'Medical' in WHSmiths?
Huffy B-0
Title: Re: Re:
Post by: La Mer on 17 July, 2003, 06:45:12 PM
Post by: La Mer on 17 July, 2003, 06:45:12 PM
caw, that means that some of the guys i know will live longer than me, them being total t0ssers n all.....
Title: Re: Re:
Post by: Adrian Bamforth on 18 July, 2003, 03:56:34 AM
Post by: Adrian Bamforth on 18 July, 2003, 03:56:34 AM
Not much to enjoy about old age if you're blind as well.
ADE
ADE
Title: Re: Re:
Post by: paulvonscott on 18 July, 2003, 04:18:50 AM
Post by: paulvonscott on 18 July, 2003, 04:18:50 AM
I even saw the article in the Daily Mail today(not my own copy I hasten to add) along with an article saying there is no male menopause, men are just fat and lazy.
"Where are you going darling?"
"Oh, just off to the potting shed dear"
"Anything interesting?"
"Oh, just thought I'd find a cure for cancer..."
"Where are you going darling?"
"Oh, just off to the potting shed dear"
"Anything interesting?"
"Oh, just thought I'd find a cure for cancer..."
Title: Re: Re:
Post by: Floyd-the-k on 18 July, 2003, 02:20:54 PM
Post by: Floyd-the-k on 18 July, 2003, 02:20:54 PM
faint chuckle to both remarks
Title: Re: Re:
Post by: Devons Daddy on 18 July, 2003, 05:40:11 PM
Post by: Devons Daddy on 18 July, 2003, 05:40:11 PM
now can someone find the article which states this effect is increased if performed a third? or is that second party. then i willpritn it out and hand it to the wife.
though this shows how every single thing you ever needed to know, or tried to justify to yourself is on the net,
though this shows how every single thing you ever needed to know, or tried to justify to yourself is on the net,
Title: Re: Re:
Post by: Quirkafleeg on 18 July, 2003, 06:07:09 PM
Post by: Quirkafleeg on 18 July, 2003, 06:07:09 PM
What are those Aussie scientists investigating next? Sheep shagging? Horse Shagging? Minogue Shagging... oh hang on that's the same thing
Title: Re:
Post by: Tex Hex on 18 July, 2003, 06:37:31 PM
Post by: Tex Hex on 18 July, 2003, 06:37:31 PM
Up to five times a WEEK cuts your chances by a third eh? I must be developing prostate anti-cancer....
Title: Re: Re:
Post by: longmanshort on 18 July, 2003, 06:44:01 PM
Post by: longmanshort on 18 July, 2003, 06:44:01 PM
If it's true, makes you wonder how ANY man would end up developing prostate cancer.
Title: Re: Re:
Post by: Adrian Bamforth on 19 July, 2003, 12:14:05 AM
Post by: Adrian Bamforth on 19 July, 2003, 12:14:05 AM
The amazing thing is how did they find someone to be the required experiment 'control'? A man with no arms perhaps?
ADE
ADE
Title: Re: Re:
Post by: Generally Contrary on 19 July, 2003, 12:28:59 AM
Post by: Generally Contrary on 19 July, 2003, 12:28:59 AM
I think you'll find that the scientists have uncovered some interesting data but have made the wrong conclusion.
It should be that liars stand a greater chance of developing prostate cancer.
It should be that liars stand a greater chance of developing prostate cancer.