2000 AD Online Forum

General Chat => Film & TV => Topic started by: Quirkafleeg on 12 February, 2005, 05:09:10 AM

Title: Nathan Barley
Post by: Quirkafleeg on 12 February, 2005, 05:09:10 AM
Well considering it's pedigree it was pretty poor... I did laugh a couple of times but it's no Brass Eye, Day Today or even Screen Burn (and not even close to it's original source)

And it seems very much behind the times. Surely this all went on years ago.
Title: Re: Nathan Barley
Post by: Trout on 12 February, 2005, 05:14:27 AM
Heh. I was wondering if you'd post this, Gary.

I watched it, too, and found it fascinating - like a bad car crash.

I didn't laugh but I think I enjoyed it, although I hope I never say "cool" again.

Also, it reminded me of someone, but I'm unsure who...
Hmmm. Blond hair. Media type. Buzzwords.

Hmmm. ;-D

- Trout
Title: Re: Nathan Barley
Post by: Adrian Bamforth on 12 February, 2005, 06:57:56 AM
Thought it was a great satire myself, reckon it'll get better as it focuses more on the characters. I was relieved that the main character was one of us and not Nathan Barley himself.

ADER
Title: Re: Nathan Barley
Post by: Byron Virgo on 12 February, 2005, 05:21:07 PM
I thought it was great - they had a man with a tiny hat, for god's sake!

Pity they couldn't use the original title...
Title: Re: Nathan Barley
Post by: WoD on 12 February, 2005, 08:39:48 PM
Me and Mrs WoD turned to each other and both said we must be getting old or something as neither of us cracked much of a smile when we watched this.
Title: Re: Nathan Barley
Post by: Conexus on 12 February, 2005, 08:56:42 PM
I gave up watching it about half way through when i just wasn't laughing. (lasted longer than when i watched friday night project, but that isn't saying much) If it wasn't for the simpsons there'd be nothing to watch friday evenings
Title: Re: Nathan Barley
Post by: thrillpowerseeker on 13 February, 2005, 04:41:29 AM
I thought it was a great pisstake out of trendy London media types..if you didnt find it funny I'd be worried...it means your probably ONE OF THEM
Title: Re: Nathan Barley
Post by: DavidXBrunt on 13 February, 2005, 07:12:58 PM
And besides which it was totally on-topic. Isn't it always nice to see Toby 'Judge Dredd/Wulf Sternhammer/Walter the Wobot/Max Normal' Longworth amongst the cast of a programme?
Title: Re: Nathan Barley
Post by: The Amstor Computer on 13 February, 2005, 07:28:58 PM
Which character was he? Had a quick scan through the main character cast & didn't see his name anywhere...
Title: Re: Nathan Barley
Post by: Mr D on 14 February, 2005, 12:04:06 AM
No, he doesn't seem to be anywhere among the cast....
Title: Re: Nathan Barley
Post by: Quirkafleeg on 14 February, 2005, 12:26:12 AM
You've not looked hard enough... he's there...
Title: Re: Nathan Barley
Post by: The Amstor Computer on 14 February, 2005, 12:52:54 AM
Having just Googled his picture, was he the bloke who interviewed Dan Ashcroft for the new job?
Title: Re: Nathan Barley
Post by: Tiplodocus on 14 February, 2005, 06:08:16 AM
I quite enjoyed it but it did seem rather stretched.  Ten minutes made the point for me.

Title: Re: Nathan Barley
Post by: IndigoPrime on 14 February, 2005, 07:42:18 AM
The problem is, these trendy Hoxton types largely vanished three years ago. According to an ex-publisher mate of mine, this would have hit the mark in 2002, but is hopelessly dated now.
Title: Re: Nathan Barley
Post by: MUD on 14 February, 2005, 07:56:36 AM
I don't know if they have died out altogether obviously not as caricature as 'Nathan Barley' but I know of a couple of people who have alot in common with him.
Title: Re: Nathan Barley
Post by: Art on 14 February, 2005, 08:20:51 AM
Exactly. I haven;t even seen the damn thing, and already I can tell it's horribly, horribly dated.

- Art. 90's new media type.
Title: Re: Nathan Barley
Post by: Quirkafleeg on 14 February, 2005, 03:33:52 PM
Bring back Attachments! (and Killernet!)
Title: Re: Nathan Barley
Post by: Byron Virgo on 14 February, 2005, 05:57:43 PM
Damn you all!

I thought it was funny, and maybe you might have too, if you'd given the programme a chance and not expected it to be the Second Coming of Chris Morris.

Now, if you'll excuse me, I'm off for a game of Cock Muff Bumhole...
Title: Re: Nathan Barley
Post by: Krustabi on 14 February, 2005, 06:01:51 PM
I agree with everything Byron said.

I like the way that Dan Ashcroft could of been the "Tim" character, but he was still ultimately as pathetic as the other characters.