The suicides of three detainees at the US base at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, amount to acts of war, the US military says.
The camp commander said the two Saudis and a Yemeni were "committed" and had killed themselves in "an act of asymmetric warfare waged against us". Link: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/5068606.stm
WORKER: Huuuh! The Judean People's Front!
PARVUS: The Judean People's Front!
OTTO: Forward all!
WORKERS: Look out! The Judean People's Front! The Judean People's Front!...
OTTO: Ve are the Judean People's Front. Crack suicide squad. Suicide squad! Attack!
[drum roll]
J.P.F.: Uh! Ugh. Aggh...
OTTO: That showed 'em, huh? Oooh. [whump] *dies*
They've managed to top that effort already.
They're now also calling it a 'good PR move'
I'm waiting for the logo re-design and viral marketing campaign.
- Steve
Link: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/5069230.stm
Notice Bush says he'd like to end Guantanamo now. As if the cunt has no control in the matter!
I suppose they've still got Abu Graib and one in Poland allegedly. And they can still subcontract out to Egypt and Syria. When do the war crimes trials start? Fuckers.
war INIT
Jeeeezus....
Notice Bush says he'd like to end Guantanamo now.
actually he said that on Monday during a speach with the Dutch PM, so it's nothing to do with the suicides.
As if the cunt has no control in the matter!
Actually, he has been pressuring the supreme court to accelerate the process of deciding how clasified evidence can be used in their trials, which has to be done before they can begin. He hopes the trials can take place later this year.
Guantanamo is still an illegal prison trials or no trials, so any contrary arguments are ridiculous.
I was meaning a war crimes trial against that idiotic fuckwit Bush.
Actually, he has been pressuring the supreme court to accelerate the process of deciding how clasified evidence can be used in their trials, which has to be done before they can begin. He hopes the trials can take place later this year.
Is that despite the whole concept of holding someone without trial being illegal in the first place?
It is an affront to everything America pretends to stand for. To whit: freedom of association, freedom of worship, freedom to bo abut your own fucking business in your own fucking country and if there was any actual bona fide proof then maybe there might be a high profile trial or something?
I thought so too, Art. If Pat Mills wrote something like this, he'd be laughed at