Ssssh! It's Pete Wells here! Apparently, I've just got a two day ban from the forum! What was it? Did you all find out I'm a dirty Volg? Do I smell? Am I Scojo? Did I unwittingly sell fake watches?
I can't live without my beloved forum for two whole days!
FREE THE SUNDERLAND ONE!
(Not) Pete Wells!
Quote from: Wellsybeer on 03 September, 2009, 05:34:11 PM
What was it?
We made John Byrne chief mod. Don't ask what the reason for the ban was, unless you want another ...
Cheers!
Jim
The very fact that you were banned means that you must be guilty of something. Stands to reason, dunnit. I mean the Mods aren't going to ban an innocent man, are they now? Try to see sense, and take your punishment like a man. Etcetera.
Just checked your recent posts - I put it to you Mr Wells, that at approximately twenty two minutes past two this afternoon, you did address The Mighty One as "Thargy".
Need I go on?
Thargy? Really? Say it ain't so - say it was a typo, Mr. Wells.
I reckon the Geezer was fittid up meself.
Stands to reason dunnit ?
Because you're a Muslim.
We had a vote last time you logged off. Baphomet demanded a sacrifice. You're name came out of the hat.
Sorry.
Wells is banned? AT LAST! I know I and my fellow art/script droids have been asking Tharg for months (possibly years in some cases) to have this Malcontent finally removed from the forum - though, to be honest, I've been petitioning for everyone but me and Leigh Girlyman Gallagher to be banned, and then the board will finally, FINALLY, be a true paradise, with us as Adam and Eve...
-pj
You must all cease communication with the criminal.
Quote from: pauljholden on 03 September, 2009, 09:02:40 PM
I've been petitioning for everyone but me and Leigh Girlyman Gallagher to be banned, and then the board will finally, FINALLY, be a true paradise, with us as Adam and Eve...
-pj
Which one are you PJ?
Quote from: pauljholden on 03 September, 2009, 09:02:40 PM
Wells is banned? AT LAST! I know I and my fellow art/script droids have been asking Tharg for months (possibly years in some cases) to have this Malcontent finally removed from the forum - though, to be honest, I've been petitioning for everyone but me and Leigh Girlyman Gallagher to be banned, and then the board will finally, FINALLY, be a true paradise, with us as Adam and Eve...
-pj
So that's the sort of twisted union that created Seth...
Quote from: Jim_Campbell on 03 September, 2009, 05:44:45 PM
Quote from: Wellsybeer on 03 September, 2009, 05:34:11 PM
What was it?
We made John Byrne chief mod. Don't ask what the reason for the ban was, unless you want another ...
Cheers!
Jim
Hey Guys and Girls !
Its not too much to ask is it if you all could well ...like ...conform to every single dictat and not like contradict anything i say ... like ever ??
Is It ??
I cant wait too see the response to this simple request.
He was Banned OK !!
I dont have to give a reason WHY and if i want i can ban someone just because i feel like it.
No, but seriously, guys ... why is the Wellster banned?
Cheers
Jim
For getting loads of great commissions done, then bloody showing off! ;)
More importantly, what's up with my hands?
Probably just need a shave.
I believe w3bz has resolved this issue, user #11474 should be unbanned now.
Oh. so it's user 11474 is it. We're just numbers to you!
Sigh.
Welcome back Pete.
Quote from: VinceBot on 04 September, 2009, 02:14:02 PM
user #11474 should be unbanned now.
We call him Number Six ...
Cheers!
Jim
Let's give him an ASBO now!
Uhhh intriguing I wonder what was the reason behind the mysterious ban? Can we expect more of these strange disappearances. Whats this blanket of silence that's been thrown over the whole affair??? Makes you wish Vector 13 was still about to investigate...
...ok maybe not
user #11474 has been reconditioned and should easily integrate back into the general population. Doubleplus good.
You did not see any black helicopters.
Remain in your homes.
There are no unmarked graves.
I was never here.
Jim
Quote from: garageman on 04 September, 2009, 02:46:08 PM
user #11474 has been reconditioned and should easily integrate back into the general population. Doubleplus good.
I bet there's still two dark-suited guys in a car outside his house though.
Quote from: uncle fester on 04 September, 2009, 03:45:56 PM
I bet there's still two dark-suited guys in a car outside his house though.
Yeah, I'll bet their names aren't Ray and Finny either.
Bleedin' shades-wearin', blue-skinned, conspiracty theorist nutjobs. Best day's work Tharg ever did was kick them in the collective plums.
HOORAY! I'M BACK!!!
There are two possible reasons for my banning. Either:
A) My shithouse technician at work thought it would be funny to pose as me, contact admin and ask them to ban me for a couple of days. This was to 'teach me a lesson about leaving my computer unlocked' as I'm always taking the piss as he locks his even if he's leaving his computer for a millisecond. He's been strutting about looking smug all day, the swine!
B) Tharg threw a hissy fit after he found me in bed with that saucy tempstress, Miss Leigh Gallagher.
You decide!
Mega thanks to the webdroids by the way, for sorting me out so quickly! However, I am missing a couple of hours and there's something itching me under my skin...
QuoteHowever, I am missing a couple of hours and there's something itching me under my skin...
Yeah, Leigh has that affect on people...
Quote from: Pete Wells on 04 September, 2009, 04:38:20 PM
Mega thanks to the webdroids by the way, for sorting me out so quickly! However, I am missing a couple of hours and there's something itching me under my skin...
What happens in Vegas, stays in Vegas.
Quote from: His Lordship rac on 04 September, 2009, 04:40:20 PM
QuoteHowever, I am missing a couple of hours and there's something itching me under my skin...
Yeah, Leigh has that affect on people...
The upside is that in the news few weeks you'll find your hair is looking lovlier than ever. Unfortunately, that is a side effect - I give you about a month.
Quote from: Pete Wells on 04 September, 2009, 04:38:20 PM
A) My shithouse technician
This is just plain rude. Without me you wouldn't have passed our silly little exam today.
Sorry I couldn't keep him away longer folks, he did have a massive strop about it this morning, which did nothing but make me feel better for doing it.
Now Pete, you run along and play nice with your cartoon mates, i'll behave myself. Or try to.
Cool! Office politics spilling over into the forum. Lemme get some popcorn and a comfy seat. The next step would be a full-blown domestic conducted via 2000ad!
If I employed the people making the banning decisions they'd be Banners' banners. If I then gave them a large flag each, the flags would be Banners' banners' banners.
Ace!
M@
Quote from: Banners on 04 September, 2009, 09:19:15 PM
If I employed the people making the banning decisions they'd be Banners' banners. If I then gave them a large flag each, the flags would be Banners' banners' banners.
Ace!
M@
and if each flag contained a picture of the Hulk's alter-ego, they'd be Banners' banner's Banners banners'
any more for any more?
Banners' banner's puny Banners banners'
A pedant writes:
Technically, they'd be Banners's banners' Banner banners.
Unless each flag contained MULTIPLE images of the Hulk-man, in which case you could have Banners's banners' Banners banners.
And if it was Banners's best banners' Banner banners ever, it would be...
Banners's banner banners' Banner banners. :o
Maybe you should just call them Mods like everyone else.
Quote from: SamuelAWilkinson on 05 September, 2009, 01:29:32 PM
A pedant writes:
Technically, they'd be Banners's banners' Banner banners.
Unless each flag contained MULTIPLE images of the Hulk-man, in which case you could have Banners's banners' Banners banners.
a pedant writes:
technically it's Banners' not Banners's as s's looks silly
Quote from: James S on 05 September, 2009, 04:02:12 PM
Quote from: SamuelAWilkinson on 05 September, 2009, 01:29:32 PM
A pedant writes:
Technically, they'd be Banners's banners' Banner banners.
Unless each flag contained MULTIPLE images of the Hulk-man, in which case you could have Banners's banners' Banners banners.
a pedant writes:
technically it's Banners' not Banners's as s's looks silly
The first pedant replies:
Whether or not it looks silly, it's still right. Modern names ending in an 's' still get an apostrophe-s ending for possessives.
I have never laughed so much in my entire life, well done Pete - excellent work er... Shit House