Messages

You don't need a caddy as you have 2 pcs, just change the jumper so it's set as a slave and plug it into the other machine

Freedomnomics by John R Lott Jr. pHD.

queensland is 10 hours ahead in winter, 9 hours ahead in summer as you don't have summer time there, so it is 7:20am monday in brisbane as i write this message

oh, i forgot to ask, what part of australia are you in, if i knew that i could figure out how many hours england is behind you, then you could always know what time it was in London

Well even if he does that it's stupid to have your auctions ending the same day as you can mail them out. If i could only mail on saturday i'd have my auctions ending wednesdays so people could pay before then, could also serve as a useful way to get people to pay promtly.

So they tell us to flee but avoid traveling?

That was good, just got through them all. *imagines what she could do with 6 of them & drools*

I recon Scojo is sub-human, i use his postings on this thread as proof

If you're not Sub-human I need proof you're not. It is possible to prove who you are. For example - you can write the following on a piece of paper...

'I am not sub-human. Date 28 July 2007'

... stick it to your head and take a photo of yourself. Upload the photo using Imageshack and I'll see it. I know what subhumans look like - I've seen a photo of some - so if you look nothing like one I'll admit you're human.

How's that for a deal?

If he denys to prove he's human it just proves that he's subhuman

so this guy
http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y247/NW10/hooligan.jpg>
get more sex with better looking women than trekkies?

Floyd:
Would you like mine? i also have a judge death badge, i could send you that too. I don't know which email you use now. I use the artcare one the most, you should have it. You sent me a few things, so i won't need anything but your address.

Hey floyd, Was that the little badge that looked like dredd's actual badge?
If it is i could always send you mine

It's not so much the word. Those who believe in global warming being caused by man could be called deniers of global warming by natural causes.

I think the arguement should be less about whether the world is warming or not, and more about what dangers are posed, and the cost/benefit ratio of possible cures. Such as the costs of corn based ethanol, it is causing a rise in the price of almost all types of food and drinks, faster than inflation. Where as there are other biofules, cheveron has signed a deal with a company which runs meat factories, who will give their meat waste to cheveron to be turned into fuel, this a far more sustainable form of bio fuel as it recycles waste products.

It's not so much the word. Those who believe in global warming being caused by man could be called deniers of global warming by natural causes.

I think the arguement should be less about whether the world is warming or not, and more about what dangers are posed, and the cost/benefit ratio of possible cures. Such as the costs of corn based ethanol, it is causing a rise in the price of almost all types of food and drinks, faster than inflation. Where as there are other biofules, cheveron has signed a deal with a company which runs meat factories, who will give their meat waste to cheveron to be turned into fuel, this a far more sustainable form of bio fuel as it recycles waste products.

Skeabost proved one of Commando's points

Many scientists have brought evidence forward but are sneered at and actually called Deniers in the same breath as Holocaust deniers which is a disgrace.

By comparing him to a flat earther, you are using an adhom attack. Which rather than seeking to disprove ascertains (as ade is doing); is seeking to belittle your opponent in an attemt to shame him into submission. This does not prove your point. Such smear tactics are not compatable with scientific discussion, it is infact comparable tactics used by the Church when the idea of a spherical earth was first put forth.

It adds nothing to the discussion, other than the appearance of trying to bully someone who is dissenting from your view, rather than showing them any errors in their argument.

No, it was Dudly, he said i should do it when we met up at for drinks just before christmas, and so i did it :)