So anyway:
A while back I bought two 2000ad graphics novels: John Smith's Cradlegrave and Leatherjack. Both great, but one thing struck me in the editing:
Cradlegrave reads like a single piece of work - unless you were looking for the "episode breaks" every 6 pages, you wouldn't even realise they were there.
However, in Leatherjack the "recap" boxes at the start of each episode have been left in. So just after seeing Leatherjack do x-y-z on one page, there'll be a caption on the next page saying "Leatherjack just did x-y-z." Jarring, and I imagine it must seem pretty ridiculous to someone reading it for the first time.
Is it common practice to leave such text in graphic novel versions of 2000ad stories, despite the fact that other episodic markers - titles, "next prog" boxes, etc - have been removed? I'm hoping it isn't, as I can't see any justification for doing so.
A while back I bought two 2000ad graphics novels: John Smith's Cradlegrave and Leatherjack. Both great, but one thing struck me in the editing:
Cradlegrave reads like a single piece of work - unless you were looking for the "episode breaks" every 6 pages, you wouldn't even realise they were there.
However, in Leatherjack the "recap" boxes at the start of each episode have been left in. So just after seeing Leatherjack do x-y-z on one page, there'll be a caption on the next page saying "Leatherjack just did x-y-z." Jarring, and I imagine it must seem pretty ridiculous to someone reading it for the first time.
Is it common practice to leave such text in graphic novel versions of 2000ad stories, despite the fact that other episodic markers - titles, "next prog" boxes, etc - have been removed? I'm hoping it isn't, as I can't see any justification for doing so.

