Quote from: TordelBack on 08 May, 2019, 02:27:54 PM
If I pitched a cross-company resource-hungry project on that scale and told a Board it would only yield £200K tops over a 3 or 4 year timescale... well, I wouldn't.
Letting Hachette reprint the material that's already in print* is free money. Allowing Hachette to subsidize any costs associated with making neglected archive material ready to reprint as Megazine floppies seems like a canny move.
Expecting any creator to subsidize Hachette's business model by foregoing royalties to which they're contractually entitled** is no-one's idea of fair. Those wondering why there are so may Slaine volumes in the collection can understand this as compensation for the loss of royalties on The Horned God.
Like many readers, I'm 100% behind Pat Mills 50% of the time.
As to why he's speaking out and whether it's effective - in his memoir, Be Pure, Mills described how he and other creators were asked to take a pay cut twenty years ago and hadn't received an increase since. Shortly after publication, Tharg got in touch to offer Mills his first rate hike since Britney was in pigtails. Metaphor.
* Which includes all of Slaine
** The idea that Rebellion introduced royalty payments is an odd one. In his memoir, Mighty One, Steve MacManus describes creating the Crisis creator contract, including royalties, which would serve as the basis for all subsequent Fleetway (and Egmont) contracts. If Rebellion changed that existing contract, I've never read mention of it. In a post on his Vicious Imagery blog, David Bishop describes Egmont's royalty terms and page rates at the moment Rebellion bought 2000ad at the turn of the century - a flat page rate for reprint and royalty payments at 'standard book rates' (8-12%, apparently) for trade collections.












