Awesome stuff, both here and in your blog too, ghostpockets!
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Show posts MenuQuote from: eamonn1961 on 04 May, 2013, 07:50:48 PM
Quote from: El Chivo on 04 May, 2013, 09:36:54 AM
Not gonna make it
Have fun guys, say hi to Ron & have a beer or 2 for me
Cheers
Chi

Quote from: Tim Tailz on 03 May, 2013, 01:05:27 PM
There's something very British about the past few weeks Dandridge. Infiltrating an enemy base underneath a motorway services, before having a fight with robotic policemen on top of a coach trip on the motorway.
Quote from: staticgirl on 02 May, 2013, 08:13:17 PMQuote from: sheldipez on 02 May, 2013, 10:11:06 AM
My newsagent lady was completely confused by the price on the cover; her reaction was priceless.
My newsagent couldn't find it at first so I pointed it out. He laughed, then gave me my change and told me what it was in pence. Top bloke.
Quote from: sauchie on 02 May, 2013, 05:17:20 PM[/b]Quote from: Hawkmonger on 01 May, 2013, 10:02:47 PMQuote from: sauchie on 01 May, 2013, 10:00:07 PM
Sucker Punch. I solemnly vow never to venture outside my comfort zone (or give Zac Snyder another break) ever again.
I thought Sucker Punch was really mild. What made it hard to watch for you Sauchie?
What everyone else wrote (above), young Hooermonger. I didn't hate it and it wasn't the worst thing I've ever seen, but it tried my patience mightily. There are lots of individual bits of production design on show which are wonderful (the Hunnish troops in the trench warfare scenes and their spooky eyes were a highlight) and I'm all in favour of the bricolage approach to forcing different aesthetics, narratives and genres together and letting the interplay of those elements cohere and find their own meaning in the mind of the viewer - I'd just prefer it to be done with greater panache than was in evidence here.
The aesthetic and tone seemed to be lifted wholesale from Jeunet and Caro, but the practical effects and production design of their films was replaced by some of the most technically inept and insipid CGI work I can remember witnessing in a mainstream film. Whereas J & C bring a playful, light-comedic touch to matters of sexuality, Sucker Punch marries unremarkable voyeurism, and the attempt to lend gravitas to the candyfloss fabula by bringing child rape (!) to the party is disastrously misjudged. I think child rape's an excellent subject for a film; but not a film which is a cross between Resident Evil 4 and Showgirls.
Quote from: Richmond Clements on 01 May, 2013, 11:23:41 PM
I have used my god-like powers to add spoiler tags - but then again, the movie is utter rubbish and doesn't deserve it...
Quote from: Recrewt on 01 May, 2013, 11:14:27 PM
Yeah, sucker punch was pretty bad. The story was all over the place and it kept flipping from one unrelated weird scenario to the next....[spoiler]then JR woke up and it had all been a dream!![/spoiler]
Quote from: Hawkmonger on 01 May, 2013, 08:33:54 AM
I've got a number of people at college and over on other forums to read Toothy, to almost universal approval (One chap just couldn't get into The Red Sea's and dropped the fold after that).
Quote from: COMMANDO FORCES on 30 April, 2013, 08:21:49 PM
Where is GOATY?