Is it just me... or is some of the scanning in the digital version of the megazine 363 just really bad ?
I'm looking at Lawless and the scanning of the art looks like a low res line-art scan from a fax of a bad photocopy it's just really grainy, doesn't really do Phil Winslade's art much justice. Is this typical of the quality of the digital version ?
I'm looking at Lawless and the scanning of the art looks like a low res line-art scan from a fax of a bad photocopy it's just really grainy, doesn't really do Phil Winslade's art much justice. Is this typical of the quality of the digital version ?
