Main Menu
Menu

Show posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Show posts Menu

Messages - ukdane

#3676
General / Re: Admit it (you're gulity!)........
10 March, 2003, 02:15:07 PM
One of my most guilty secrets must be that I bought Judgement Day off ebay for a vast sum of money- (I wouldn't do it again given the chance!)- and haven't re-read it yet.

(For those who need to know, I used just short of some nifty looking squid to aquire it!)
#3677
General / Re: Admit it (you're gulity!)........
10 March, 2003, 02:06:57 PM
DD: Welcome to Back Prog Buyers Annonymous. I've done a similar thing, without Mrs Dane's knoweledge.
#3678
General / Re: Admit it (you're gulity!)........
10 March, 2003, 01:45:00 AM
Is that the one with the Tron like figures on the cover?
#3679
General / Re: Admit it (you're gulity!)........
09 March, 2003, 09:54:11 PM
I really enjoyed all the Star Wars films includin AOTC and TPM, and still think the Ewoks in ROTJ are worse than Jar Jar.

I'd also admit to enjoying the Dredd movie in i's own right (ie as Danny Canon's perception of what the film should be)- and feel it had one or two redeming qualitites, however I've only seen it once, so my memory of it isn't great.
#3680
General / Admit it (you're gulity!)
09 March, 2003, 05:01:13 PM
Ok, anyone want to admit to something 2000ad related which would surprise/shock other boarders?

I'll start...

... duting the 90's (the so called bad run of 2000ad) I not only continued to purchase 2000ad, but I bought three copies each week, for 2 or 3 years. I kept one copy for myself, then tore the other two up, in order to make "collections" of the stories.
I'm ashamed to admit one of the stories I put together is Wireheads- however, I would like to point out that I've never actuall read it in either this format, or as it appeared in the original progs.

OT: I'm also ashamed to admit that I have started watching Fame Academy, which is currently being shown over here, and I actually enjoy watching them sing for survival each week.

Right, someone else's turn to embarrass themselves now!
#3681
General / Re: Poster art special
10 March, 2003, 01:47:44 AM
Trout: What the URL for Philip Bond's site? The one I have no longer works.

Watcher: It was towards the end of invasion, but before Mach 0. It might have been at some point when Mach1 was taking a break... I don't really recall the extact issue, as it's about a month since I read it.
#3682
General / Re: Poster art special
09 March, 2003, 09:58:38 PM
PVS: Sure, the DVD version would be great.

And I agree with DXB in that it they can reprint stuff AS LONG AS IT's WITHOUT THE VARIOUS LOGO's AND TEXT BUBBLES.

Talking of TPO, I'm still on my backprog catchup mission, and I'm sure there should be plenty more tales to tell, that have been excluded from TPO in the Meg. For example there must be a reason why the Volgan war was not completed in MACH1 as Tharg originally promised, but instead was recounted in the Robusters tale.
And why early pictures of Judge Cal resemble Pat Mills so much.
#3683
General / Poster art special
09 March, 2003, 04:55:17 PM
Inspired by Ian Gibson's Halo Jones artwork.

If Rebellion were to release a 32 page (same size as 2000ad) special which only contained original star scans of popular characters by regular/popular artists, would you buy it?

And what/who would you like to see in it?

(I imagine that this wouldn't be feasable as the cost of each image would be very high, but my question still stands)
#3684
General / Re: what do you do for other hobby...
07 March, 2003, 03:20:19 PM
I'm with Mat on this one.

I don't have time or money for anything much outside of comics (and being in here).
#3685
Website and Forum / Re: Future Shop
07 March, 2003, 03:23:01 PM
#3686
Website and Forum / Re: Future Shop
07 March, 2003, 03:18:56 PM
they sent out thousands of flyers advertising the statues by robert harrop and go to the future shop for details.but as we all know they where not there

With the exception of the DR & Quinch models, the three other figures ARE available in the futureshop.

The DR & Quinch models aren't even advertised on Harrops own webpage.
#3687
General / Re: FAO: Editors and former editor...
10 March, 2003, 06:11:57 PM
Gruddamn, so they likely hood of ever seeing this in the Meg is less than zero?
#3688
General / Re: FAO: Editors and former editor...
10 March, 2003, 05:43:33 PM
You got me there, I can't remember if it was finished and not completely published, or never finisged in the first place. The Watcher might know.
#3689
General / Re: FAO: Editors and former editor...
09 March, 2003, 10:01:53 PM
... after all, reprinting 7 issues of an unfinished strip would be pointless.



-Yer "completist" Dane
#3690
General / Re: FAO: Editors and former editor...
09 March, 2003, 09:59:45 PM
Tu-Plang's spot on. I don't think they ever finished it either. I did mean as he suggests, getting them to finish it off a la Scarlet Traces.