Messages

And William Hauge.

"shit hot politicians"

Oliver Letwin.

I like watching know-all students put in their places by shit hot politicians.

I flogged a dead horse, once.

Oh my God I've just found out!

I take it all back!

Please just don't kilf-

I like this killfile shit, but I wish I knew what on earth it meant!

:)

You might want to scrape that went off, then.

Syllogistically speaking, I think I've just come.

Amen, people.

If anyone has the balls to further debate the existence of ghosts and the supernatural, I'm all ears -

and promise to sweeping ignorant bigotted assumptions to a bear minimum.

(  o  )  (  o  )

You have the air of a man whose argument has just collapsed, sir.

You started with the thinly veilled sarcasm while I was busy debating; no-one asked you to start jumping to defenses with snotty remarks.

Check back over the text if you like.

Don't seem to like any sarcasm fired back at you eh? ;)

Appreciate your input Woolly, but the stance of requiring proof to disprove something that cannot be proved is nonsensical and it is rife within believers of magic and supernatural.

Of course I am only asserting my opinions, but so harsh to some people is the possibility that supernatural and magic may not exist on any known level that noses are inevitably put out of joint.

No, I say again: no-one is seeing ghosts.

If we all listened to you then a man could not make any statements without adding "in my opinion" as a prefix.

I am not alone in drawing on scientific and logical facts to form a cast iron view on a debatable subject; on a subject that has enthralled and mystified mankind for thousands of years, yet is proved only in the minds of those who have been deluded into believing in the supernatural.

Of course you don't know. You don't even pretend to know. Me? From my life experiences and discussions with "believers" I know the possibility of ghost-related apparitions and after-life-running-about exists only in certain minds.

It is my right to be sceptical - as it is your right to argue against scepticism.

But you've got nothing to show me, and I have every reason to dismiss such magic talk.

And I asked you if it was right that I'd made my point of view clear - the rest was in brackets.

True Woolly that humans have been dedicated to spirits and apparitions etc. for bah-zillions of years, but I would think that in the days before we understood what the hell was going on a bit more they were the best answers man could come up with.

I would not knock tribal traditions based on the supernatural still functioning today [though I still think they are deluded], but the mass pre-occupation with invisible ridiculousness in today's society is mankind misusing the gift of choice.

Answer Goaded From Eyebrows: whether you know me or not is not relevant, and the discussion was WoD's in any case. Perhaps such an opening statement is too much to the point for some, but I can't think of any other response that is more truth. No-one is seeing ghosts.

I only said some people have too much time on their hands, and essentially there are no such things as ghosts or ghostliness.

Didn't make no "inferiority" jibes, just made a point of view clear [albeit, in the knowledge that said POV will contrast starkly with Mrs Boots, but I can't help it if folk take opposite viewpoints as personally insulting].

Isn't that right Mister Eyebrows?

Mister Eyebrows?

You didn't read my reply, Mr. C.

I repeat, I am willing to learn more about new possibilities should the initial spark appear logical.

If the idea seems preposterous, then I'd rather file it in the "crap" bin than in the "well, you never know" cabinet. This leaves more braintime for the good stuff, yes?

If the preposterous is proven to be real and true in my lifetime [scientific stuff, possible - ghosts, I don't think so] then I look forward to the big surprises.

And I agree with Dudley - the minute a fellow begins to disagree with the "anything goes" stance of your precious superuniverse of infinite delights, certain folk become all defensive and claiming they are "not dull"....

PS.

Didn't answer your question? Of "what my life is like, exciting or dull?". Errrrmmm.. let me think now... (does it HAVE to be one or the other...?)

:)))