Every time I read an interview with Ennis, I'm struck by how perceptive he is about his own work. I'm really not a big fan of Ennis' output, having found signature projects like Preacher to be both boring and unpleasant, but I have enjoyed some of Hellblazer and 2000AD stuff (I still rate 'Monkey on my Back' very highly, incongruous West Wall aside). However, he comes across as having such a keen self-depreciating awareness of where his scripts (in my opinion) went wrong that it's impossible not to like the guy, or believe that he could do something I really enjoyed in the future. His analysis of Judgement Day and Strontium Dogs are spot-on, in terms of both strengths ans weaknesses. The Return of the Gronk is the best of the stories, the Darkest Star story, while not qite working is a good try, and Nigel Dobbyn's art is terrific, and underrated.
Sorry to hear about your non-interview Bishop, there's nothing more frustrating than looking at your CV, looking at a rejection letter, and wondering where the fuck you went wrong - at least with an interview or some feedback there's some learning to be had, and you can get some sense of what to do next.
Sorry to hear about your non-interview Bishop, there's nothing more frustrating than looking at your CV, looking at a rejection letter, and wondering where the fuck you went wrong - at least with an interview or some feedback there's some learning to be had, and you can get some sense of what to do next.
