Main Menu
Menu

Show posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Show posts Menu

Messages - Radbacker

#766
General / Re: Which Editor "saved" 2000AD?
11 August, 2010, 03:04:14 PM
well it's always been able to pick up a few new readers, i actually started reading and collecting in the dark days of about prog890 and had never really been into comics so it must of still had something in it that had the Zarjaz as they'd say.

Of course on back reads I realise that era is a particularly average period in the prog (i've since managed to aquire and read quite a few back issues so while my collection isn't complete i've got at least a few issues from nearly all earlier periods) but it really started to pick up about the Dante/Sinister Dexter era (not sure of the editor as I don't pay too much attention to that sort of stuff plus I was really wasted in the 90's and really thought it was edited by a green alien ;)).  The prog started to gain some decent new ongoing series that it was lacking up to that point.  Of course I think the Rebellion era has been the best it's ever been and I'm not just sucking up, the prog really does blow any other comic out there away.

CU Radbacker
#767
General / Re: This weeks Strontium Dog
11 August, 2010, 03:11:13 AM
QuoteI don't think that Marvel can help themselves, though. Remember when The Punisher blew up that bar with all the c-z lister supervillans in it, chilling and chatting over the bad-ol-days? I think it was during the Civil War era and it worked really well for the story. 

Anyway, not one of them had a legitimate reason to come back. Not one of them! Yet, a few issues later, as I recall, lo and behold we find that they all crawled out afterwards with scrapes on their faces, A-Team style.

What's the feckin point!?   

but Stiltman stayed dead and he was important! ;)

CU Radbacker
#768
 :lol: :lol: :lol:

CU Radbacker
#769
Film & TV / Re: Clash of the Titans
09 August, 2010, 09:56:54 AM
such a waste of a good idea, movie made me sleepy when i fibally go to watch it which is odd as there is nothing overly terribale about it, its just so pedestrian and thats something you shouldn't be able to say about a movie where gods and titans clash!!!

You know I wouldn't mind seeing a God of War movie it could be what this movie should have nbeen.

CU Radbacker
#770
Off Topic / Re: The penis is evil!
09 August, 2010, 07:14:10 AM
I thought the thread was about this
very NSFW and classic Troma

http://www.dailymotion.com/family_filter?urlback=%2Fvideo%2Fxebgnu_troma-s-father-s-day-uncut-trailer_shortfilms

CU Radbacker
#771
Welcome to the board / Re: :)) hi and a Q too :D
07 August, 2010, 12:18:24 AM
good evening from OZ, welcome to the board.  I'm sorry I cant help with your question the story sounds familiar but not sure of exact issue.  i'm sure one of the board databases will be along soon to answer your question.

CU Radbacker
#772
General / Re: Strontium Dog - The Movie
07 August, 2010, 12:14:39 AM
couldn't go wrong if you went with the Kreelman Conspiracy, the one thast re-introduced Alpha and started the flashback stories.  That was a reworked TV script IIRC.  Good introduction to the character and the world and lots of bangbang shooty action, oh and Jonny is possibly the badest assest he's ever been (keep in mind i haven't read Rage or that era of stories).

CU Radbacker
#773
Film & TV / Re: The Social Network - Trailer
06 August, 2010, 04:22:34 AM
I'm still up for this, as mentioned earlier Fincher and Reznor have my butt in the seat.
On a similar note there's a movie coming out called The middle Men, about the guys who designed the software (or widgit or whatever the correct terminology is) for paying credit over the internet way back in 1996.  A bunch of horney nerds who didn't like to be judged buying their porn in person so they created this and then became billionairs.  MIght be ore interesting than the Facebook movie due to the apparently excessive number of boobs shown.

CU Radbacker
#774
Repo Men is arsom, though it does loose the plot in the last act [spoiler]The whole weird organ removal and scanning filmed like a sex scene, it was just weird but i suppose if it was all happening in his mind it could be just to show how his job really f'd him up[/spoiler].
I think its a prety good asthetic to inspire to.

CU Radbacker
#775
Welcome to the board / Re: Hi!
05 August, 2010, 06:31:52 AM
Greetings from OZ, I wasn't online back in the Usernet days but this place is great have fun.
:oBarney is a real person i thought that was the name of the Database here :o
greeting to you to unless you are just a machine that has gained sentience and come to destroy us all.

CU Radbacker
#776
Welcome to the board / Re: Aloha
05 August, 2010, 03:46:22 AM
ello from the land downunder.

CU Radbacker
#777
General / Re: Why 2000AD art is so awsome
04 August, 2010, 02:49:58 PM
Should this be shifted into creative i think i may have put it in the wrong section

shift if required mods

CU Radbacker
#778
General / Why 2000AD art is so awsome
04 August, 2010, 02:48:46 PM
Lets be honest, the art in 2000AD is always good and quite often arsom.  There are too many to mention but many a time i've opened the prog and just had my mind blown (even some of the worst written drek in tooth has been rendered readable by its art, I'm looking at you Inferno and most of Millars tooth output that boy lucked out with some excelent artists).  This has rarely happened when i've read a US comic.  Is this because alot of Tooth art is inked by the penciler (if it is, I might be wrong but there's rarely and Inker credits iin the credits box) and retain more of its true intention or do I totally have the wrong end of the stick.  I have noticed in some cases when you see the pencils and then completed piece they sometimes look quite different. 

More to the point I'm not an artist in any way but i do understand how drawing a comic works (the whole Thunbnail, pencils, ink, colour proccess) but I've got a question for the artists on the board do you feel or  would you feel that someone else inking your work takes away soem of your ownership of it. 

Please also note I'm not putting down inkers either it's all art and as I said at the start of my post I have all teh artistic tallent off a Baboon.

CU Radbacker
#779
Books & Comics / Re: More Moore?
04 August, 2010, 02:29:00 PM
I'll second that DC universe book, its got some great stories in it and some awsome O'neill art on a couple of the shorts in there.  You will double up on Killing joke though.

CU Radbacker
#780
ahh yes, that would make sense as they're polarized.

CU Radbacker