Messages

Any student found guilty of antagonism, violence or criminal damage should be kicked out of uni altogether.
What started out as a good idea tuned into a disgrace and I was sickened and getting angry just looking at the events on the news. Don't get me started on the idiots that where throwing objects off the building onto the police. Attempted murder springs to mind.




V

I am always very suspicious of the black clad black masked teenagers/young adults who appear at protests and whenever they do it always turns into a riot.They are like a Rent-A-Mob of Useful Idiots who are hired to sabotage protests.They are a convenient way to discredit legitimate peaceful protests as police often just stand and watch them and do nothing while peaceful legitimate protesters are often corralled and assaulted.I have seen this time and time again.

I would like to know exactly who hires and recruits them and why the police often just stand and watch them smash up property*.They need to be surrounded and have the shit kicked out of them after they have been de-masked and photographed and i dont mean by the police.If you smash up others property then you deserve it.
Rioting achieves nothing anyway.


*I have my suspicions.State sponsored Dis-Establishmentarianism.


While i was typing i was thinking that there are moves to audit and end the privately owned FEDRES Ponzi scheme operators before they buy enough Treasury bonds to forclose on the US not to mention at least 100 other reasons.They will wind down the operation to escape being seized and audited once the dollar collapses which is already happening 100 years more or less after it was established which is interesting because last weekend they were celebrating 100 years of financially and politically raping the US.

Crashing the dollar creates the right pretext to wind down the FED but it will be only for public consumption.

In the meantime there will be moves to end the FEDRES in as much as incorporating it into a centralised world bank owned and controlled by the same Ponzi scheme FEDRES operators - the solution to the current economic problems-the solution to the problem and the reaction they themselves caused.Their base of operations moves out of the US where they think they wont be scrutinised.They might think that removing the focus of all the attention will save themselves but that would be a miscalculation.

Another scenario is that they want to bankrupt the US before the FEDRES is able to be scrutinised to completely disable its people and its political system.Again this is a miscalculation as the FEDRES has gone way past the point of no return.

I think both of these will happen.

I say this because there is so much heat on the FEDRES that is growing by the day that something has to give and its simply a matter of who does what first.Anyway in the end the FEDRES will be very difficult to properly investigate as its activities are so convoluted and no doubt they have destroyed any evidence that would compromise them but again this is another miscalculation as the QE 2 is an act of economic terrorism in itself.Things will get a lot worse before they get any better unfortunately simply because its all accelerating so quickly which is an obvious strategy on their part.

The FEDRES financially rapes you and the TSA feels you up.



Keep the heat and the pressure on them as it is having a positive effect and tell others about this or else sit there and dont do anything while you sabotage your own future.

Meltdown Man is also out now. I saw it in FP on Saturday.

I thought that wasnt out until the 11th November ?


FFS.I could have bought it already without waiting until Saturday.

[buying stuff purely for the sake of it]

....buying stuff purely for the sake of it.

My brother in law really worries me in this respect - he is always buying the latest gadgets and games, but seems to enjoy the act of owning things more than actually using them. He owns myriad consoles and games but I know for a fact that he doesn't actually play the games he buys - just mucks around with them for half an hour before putting them back on the shelf. Last year he bought Modern Warfare 2 on both Xbox and PS3 (they are identical games), and was unable to give me a decent reason why.

He also blows silly amounts of money on stuff like mountain bikes, underwater cameras and guitars, which generally just end up in the garage. He's always looking for excuses to blow money on some gadget or other (I got some photos framed for him recently and he started on about buying a new power drill so he could hang them!), and is constantly posting about his latest purchases on facebook (which is actually a fairly transparent way of boasting imo), as if doing so somehow validates or reinforces his existence. He tends to spend most of his free time browsing Play.com/Amazon etc, planning his next purchase - and also spoils his son absolutely rotten with insanely pricey gifts.

All in all it concerns me a great deal, because AFAIK he doesn't earn a huge amount of money, so I do sometimes wonder where it's coming from...

Is there a word for this sort of behaviour? Shopoholicism?

Or Impulse buying.

Compulsive behaviour.

My sister spent 50,000 on stuff and 15,000 was credit.

By the way, for those of you with Sky- apparently there's a special competition on in london that day, where anyone carrying a dvd containing the first three episodes of the walking dead tv series can win a kiss from a pretty girl, if they happen to give them up when asked.

SBT

Note: it might be me in a wig.

How will i recognise you in a wig ?

A Rebellion trade reprinting stuff that's 29 years old? Surely we can work that out? Is it Meltdown Man?
SBT

Its elementary my dear Watson !.

The clues were there.

I am sure you have typed or said things you dont mean before.

I'm more likely to get in trouble for saying things I do mean
Regards

Robin

So am i.

Hassle this evening.

Where i was working today i was chasing cables into a wall before plastering and i must have clipped the insulation on the wire exposing cable which was plastered over today or its plaster on a connecting block on another socket.I know where the fault is and the electrician has been called out this evening to fix it because the clients power was tripping out as they have had a new circuit board and breaker which is highly sensitive.

The point here is why was the circuit live in that room anyway and why were the ends of the cables that were live not covered in insulation tape ?

Why didnt i think to disconnect that circuit because it was live or insulate the cables ?

I got a shock from it earlier but i have been shocked by 240v power lots of times before and it has never done any harm.

In the meantime she is now allowed to study for a qualification in horticulture

Apart from being forced to study part time she has done nothing else to improve her chances of finding work or even teach herself something at home.

Pardon the snippage, but in one paragraph she is allowed to study and in the next she's forced to study. It's handy to know which is correct, as it has some bearing on the claim that she's done nothing to improve her chances of finding work.

I would force her to work in an all male enviroment or do voluntary work with men as its men that go to work and pay taxes so she can sit around all day with a chip on her shoulder along with her sense of entitlement.

Just read that one back to yourself, Peter, and let us know if you're really prepared to stand by it.

Regards

Robin

She has to either study which extends her benefits or find work that is part time.Its been a while since i read the article but she had to either do one or the other.It was something to do with a reduction in benefits.My point was she wouldnt have gone on the course otherwise as previously she had done nothing to attempt to find work and there was no need to do so.No incentive.She had to be prompted to do something which was my point instead of being motivated to do it herself since its all provided.



As for the second comment i shouldnt have said "force" as i wouldnt force anyone to do anything *generally* speaking but otherwise it wouldnt do her any harm to work with men but the all male enviroment was a bit much but her comments wound me up.Reactionary Hyperbole.

I am sure you have typed or said things you dont mean before.



@Roger is real as he went to the HI-EX where i met him as i travelled in a minubus there and back.Roger isnt his real name and he is not like he comes across online.He just types that kind of thing.No idea why.

It was part time study not full time.


Ush:no need to be so shocked as it was a reaction to her comments and its certainly no more ridiculous than her anti-men statements.

In the meantime she is now allowed to study for a qualification in horticulture

Apart from being forced to study part time she has done nothing else to improve her chances of finding work or even teach herself something at home.

Pardon the snippage, but in one paragraph she is allowed to study and in the next she's forced to study. It's handy to know which is correct, as it has some bearing on the claim that she's done nothing to improve her chances of finding work.

I would force her to work in an all male enviroment or do voluntary work with men as its men that go to work and pay taxes so she can sit around all day with a chip on her shoulder along with her sense of entitlement.

Just read that one back to yourself, Peter, and let us know if you're really prepared to stand by it.

Regards

Robin

She has to either study which extends her benefits or find work that is part time.Its been a while since i read the article but she had to either do one or the other.It was something to do with a reduction in benefits.My point was she wouldnt have gone on the course otherwise as previously she had done nothing to attempt to find work and there was no need to do so.No incentive.She had to be prompted to do something which was my point instead of being motivated to do it herself since its all provided.

As for the second comment i shouldnt have said "force" as i wouldnt force anyone to do anything *generally* speaking but otherwise it wouldnt do her any harm to work with men but the all male enviroment was a bit much but her comments wound me up.Reactionary Hyperbole.

I am sure you have typed or said things you dont mean before.



@Roger is real as he went to the HI-EX where i met him as i travelled in a minubus there and back.Roger isnt his real name and he is not like he comes across online.He just types that kind of thing.No idea why.

No reason at all not why i wont be going to this.

Now we have another family in and it looks like it's all starting again  



I suppose I'll be accused of being a Daily Mail reader (yawn), shall we continue until everyone decides to just jack it all in and live on benefits!

So lets have some decent ideas on how to sort this mess out instead....

Over to the forum  

p.s. I'm not having a go at people who fall on hard times, are injured, have diasbilities, etc.. as that is what benefits are for![/color]

Your neighbour is worthless trash just like her tenants when you think about it.

What does she contribute to society ?

Not a lot but each month she takes 950 quid off the taxpayer to pay for her investment as that is all she is interested in.She is not interested in you and how her tenants adversely affect your life and how her rental property would have an adverse effect on yours if you tried to sell it.She obviously is only interested in herself and she is also useless selfish trash and a parasite as well as the tenants.


anyway one size fits all policies dont and wont work and unless this proposal profiles those that abuse the system and those that dont i cant support it but i do get sick and tired of layabouts as well and theres times when i do think that cutting their benefits would taech them a lesson as they make a career out of cheating and exploiting the system.

I am sick of liberal type attitudes that promotes this kind of thing.

Heres a good example:

I was reading about a Lesbian who chose to have a child outside of a relationship with a sperm donor and then decides that she cant earn a living because she has to stay at home and look after a child and when the child goes to school she can sit around all day while the kid is at school and on and on it goes  

She knew only too well that she would have everything paid for before she *chose* to have a child and this is wrong.

She doesnt like men but she has a child by a man purely because she decides she wants a child and then because she has a child she has a sense of entitlement.In the meantime she is now allowed to study for a qualification in horticulture where she has to do something once or twicew a week because this was the easier option as aversed to working and finding a job now the kid is at school.

Studying for her is just a cop out and she probably wont get a job as she has no work history or experience and now there is less chance of getting a job so she will most likely be on benefits for the rest of her life as she is totally useless.Apart from being forced to study part time she has done nothing else to improve her chances of finding work or even teach herself something at home.

Totally useless and whats more in the old days she would live with her parents who would look after herself and the child instead of the state.

Children equals free cash.

Useless Trash.

I would force her to work in an all male enviroment or do voluntary work with men as its men that go to work and pay taxes so she can sit around all day with a chip on her shoulder along with her sense of entitlement.

The government's side of the bargain will be the promise of a new "universal credit", to replace all existing benefits, " - IDS

What does this mean ?

Why wasnt it explained in the article ?

"that will ensure it always pays to work rather than stay on welfare."

Is that an offer you couldnt refuse ?

Do you get a financial incentive to stay in work ?

|How much will that cost ?

If its not a financial incentive then it can only be some form of coercion or/and withdrawal of entitlements if you dont conform to a strict govt criteria.

"A universal credit"

Credit instead of cash ?

Food stamps ?

Vouchers/credits only redeemable at certain govt sanctioned outlets ?

Deny the unemployable/unemployed any choice at all in how their benefits are spent ?

How much will it cost to design and set up and organise and run an entirely new system of benefits and benefit payments ?



Unless its already been carefully planned and organised in advance of course.That wouldnt be surprising at all.

Rubbish weather on Saturday but it might change........

I am late paying council tax because i mislaid the bill as it got mixed up with other paperwork and then forgot about it completely.Then i was curious why i hadnt been sent a bill and so i thought bollocks to them if they cant send a bill as i cant pay it unless i am billed.Why should i ask them to do their job when they should be doing it anyway ?

So now i have got a court summons which isnt a big deal but as i forgot that i had been billed then why wasnt i sent a reminder ??

The bill was sent in late August and its now roughly 3 months later so i should have been sent a reminder 1.5 months ago where i would have been given the opportunity to avoid a court summons.Now i am not allowed to pay in instalments as i have to pay the full amount including paying for services i have yet to receive which is normally out of the question but legislation by govt stipulates i have to pay in full to avoid a CCJ.

I am going to say something about this but they can have a full payment if they want as it doesnt matter to me but just to spite them and make my point i am not paying the 25 quid court summons charge.

Expect a climbdown, with the policy quietly dropped when the details of it prove to be unworkable.

Its clearly a reactionary policy that hasnt been thought out at all and its not even a policy as its a proposal.

Does the economy own the people or do the people own the economy?

Does the government own the people or do the people own the government?

Just who the Hell has the right to tell people that they MUST work at menial jobs for virtually no pay?

The government/governance and the economy own the people until the people decide that the reverse is true but it takes so long to happen because the majority cant be bothered to do anything about it.

This is where complacency - laziness and apathy and selfishness gets everyone but to be honest i didnt have any real interest in politics until about 10 years ago and i didnt have a clue but i always knew that something was wrong and it wasnt what it seemed.Before that all i knew was one party got voted in until it all went wrong and then another party got voted in and then that all went wrong and then the other party gets voted in again and all that went wrong and so on and so on......

I didnt have a clue as i just thought they were just incompetent idiots as i dint know about the bigger picture but the one thing i could never understand and still dont why everyone just tolerated it and went along with it with a kind of fatalism that was like saying "Thats just the way it is".

Complacency costs and heres where everyone starts paying.