Messages

Its partly because Microsoft/Sony are a Duopoly and can charge what they like.

Its all about $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

They are manufactured in China/SE Asia as well which makes games even more profitable.I would rather buy pre-owned anyway.

While we're on the subject, realization dawned on me today that my productive capability is entirely surplus to requirements given the current state of the economy, and it wouldn't matter to the economy if I died tomorrow. On the contrary, if I did die tomorrow, it would liberate some capital and probably benefit the economy. How depressing. I'm worth more to the economy dead than alive.

Think about how you are depriving the criminal system of tax revenue.

Anyway the economy is rigged so its not worth worrying about.

How could the answer be No to that ?

I dont know where else to post this but the local newsagent sells 3 copies of 2000ad per week which is 156 copies pa.

As i understand it the total value of the planets known* gold reserves in the form of bullion is 3.7 trillion so there simply is not enough gold to go round and i dont really know if the Gold standard is a viable option while the economy is flooded with worthless cash backed with nothing so there would have to be some kind of redress to be able to offset currency against gold.

I say known as there may well be more than that hidden away in undisclosed locations or in places like Switzerland and my guess is the criminals are hoarding it to manipulate the gold market and when it suits them they will dump a lot of it onto the market so the value will drop by a lot and all the small time investors will lose out.

Bailing out a nation with gold isnt a good idea for that reason as its too volatile a commodity because if this country is given gold then that gold is going to have to be sold off and if its advertised that an unknown bebefactor is going to give gold the4n that will instantly cause ripples in the gold market.

Is the value of the gift* 5 billion ?

Thats peanuts.I really need to read this again but a lot of this sounds very spurious and since when does the BOE launder cash since its not that kind of bank and its certainly not a clearing bank and since when does the IRA have 1 billion to launder ?

They have never5 been that well funded as it sounds ludicrous.

"Foundation X" - I wonder if this is one of the Rothschild/Rockefeller tax free foundations ?

I need to read this again and its going to take ages to go through it all.

*No such thing as a free gift and whoever gives cash will want some sort of control as there will be conditions.


Beware of those who bear gifts.....

It would be far easier and more satisfying to force the Banksters to wipe the debt.Why should we have to pay them for their scams ??

There is only 13 f
Amilies after all and at the most 300 of them within the families and there are more of us than them and when they have to bail out they will more than likely live out at sea rather than on land on their yachts and cruisers......

Whois Record For Unoitc.org

Registrant Name:UNOITC HEAD QUARTERS
Registrant Organization:The Office Of International Treasury Control
Registrant Street1:1133 Connecticut Avenue
Registrant Street2:
Registrant Street3:
Registrant City:Washington
Registrant State/Province:District of Columbia
Registrant Postal Code:20036
Registrant Country:US

http://whois.domaintools.com/unoitc.org

F them.They are affiliated to the UN which means they sre affiliated to Banksters and criminals and they are based in Washington DC with all the rrest of the criminals and i notice they are a sovereign entity.So its alright for them to be a sovereign entity but its not alright for individual nations to be sovereign entities ??

If its them giving the cash then my suspicions are correct and if they give cash and its accepted then its nothing more than a takeover and we will be beholden to the UN and a protectorate of the UN so if its them i would turn down their offer.

I need to know more about this but thanks for posting.

alarm bells are ringing......

The first Matrix film was very clever and very original and it was a complete film in its own right but the next 2 films were superfluous action films that didnt really add an awful lot.

The actual idea of the Matrix itself was brilliant.

I think i need to read all that again.........

Bailing out entire countries is all well and good but its not very clever handing over gold to criminals.

David Cameron and the Coalition govt flip flop on future referendums on the EU.

David Cameron and the coalition govt flip flop on reversing the database/surveillance state.

Its just what i expected and i even said as much.

enough said.

On a related note I don't really get the appeal of Saw movies. And as of today I've watched 7 of them.

I do. They are really horrible and mean-spirited, but they have very high production values and they are continuity-heavy. Whereas a lot of horror franchises make stuff up as they go along and draw a line under each episode before starting a new one from scratch, the Saw series takes the trouble to incorporate the plot and characters of previous instalments and, through flashbacks and retrospective inserts, explains later developments in terms of the motivations of characters the audience has seen before.

Personally I watch it in the hope of seeing some of the kidnap victims turn the tables on their captors. I remain hopeful.

I think the latest SAW film does something like that or concludes.Not quite sure as i havent watched it.

A comments section on a website keep removing my comments for no reason at all.The comments were not offensive in any way and they were on topic and the subject matter is political as its alternative media.

They obviously don't like your politics. You're either too right wing or too left wing for them. They presumably have a party 'line' and you're not toeing it.

My comments are really no different to many of the other comments and my politics/comments were supporting the article that i was commenting on and my politics reflects those of the website so i really dont know what their problem is but i do mean to contact the owner of the website about this matter to see what they say about.

I have never had any problems on this website but this particular problem has happened before and then it stops and then it starts again.I havent got a clue what their problems but its the wrong way to moderate a website.

The party line is anti NWO/Globalism-anti corrupt politics and it promotes constitutional representative govt.

The moderators need sorting out but its not for them to indulge their own petty indulgences about this or that and just remove comments for no good reason and i have told them that i take screenshots of every comment i post.

Now we are left with the question of why investment bankers are paid so much.

They steal our money.Just lately taxpayers are paying their bonuses.

In principle i dont object if they werent part of a criminal system as they are/were being paid to take risks which pay off so that everyone who has a pension or invests in their future makes money for themselves and their children.

Thats how it used to work but not anymore.........

*

A comments section on a website keep removing my comments for no reason at all.The comments were not offensive in any way and they were on topic and the subject matter is political as its alternative media.

Other comments above mine that are racist or were abusive/flaming others are allowed to stay unmoderated.I realise that the owners of the website can do what they like ultimately but the style of moderating is just terrible and unprofessional particularly as the website is anti-censorship.others have the same problem and its perverse that drivel is unmoderated yet thoughtful comments are removed for no apparent reason.There were no breaches of the code of conduct at any time.

Its a bit like comments being randomly removed but thats not it.

Its not a fault as the comments upload perfectly so i screenshot and then refresh and the comment has gone.The comment section uses the Wordpress template which requires registration.

This happened 3 times in a row with three seperate comments on the same thread.

I was fed up with this so i posted another comment pointing out that i am not allowed to comment on the topic and i called the moderator "Chickenshit" and that comment isnt removed !

Its just completely perverse and its like someone is playing silly games.

The moderators will not respond to emails.

I think I prefer B too. I'm not keen on those really wide legged scenes like A and C.

I never thought anything of it until someone else pointed it out but that wasnt the reason i changed to B.Its not like its pornographic material and men have crotches and as long as their bits are covered with clothing i couldnt care less about it.

I thought B was closest to the McMahon cover but it needs a law book.

That does look like an interesting unique story.

Reading the excerpt, I didn't realise he actually took his own life in the end. I guess he knew he was going and decided to go out on his own terms. Sad.

It was the most empowering thing to do in those circumstances.

Oh, I didn't intend that as a statement of judgement.

I never thought or said that you did.

[cannot]

Now, while I can understand why someone might think that looks like someone talking on a mobile phone, I cannot understand how he came to the conclusion that it's a man in drag.

Has he never seen an overweight middle-aged woman before?

To be fair, those are some rather immense feet for an old lady.

I thought there was something odd and a bit creepy about her[?].

Peculiar walk as well.

What is the context of the scene ?

Knowing that might explain things a bit better.

The film is called The Circus which might explain odd looking characters but did anyone present in the film notice the actor was talking into a mobile back in 1928 ?

If not why not ?

Having thought about it a bit more B is also very good if not better than A.

The only thing wrong with B is the comedy sad faced expression on JD but that might not have been intentional.The B picture looks like it has been cropped on one side but B should have the Law book in it as it would be incomplete without it.

Definately B.

For some reason when i clicked on post reply and scrolled down the edge of Pic B had a quarter missing on one side but after i posted the comment and scrolled down the picture is complete.

No idea what is going on there.