Quote from: King Trout on 27 March, 2012, 01:23:14 AM
Wow. You people will fight about anything.
No we won't!!
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Show posts MenuQuote from: King Trout on 27 March, 2012, 01:23:14 AM
Wow. You people will fight about anything.
Quote from: ZippoCreed on 26 March, 2012, 07:30:38 PM
I am officially an arse. I was so busy I forgot to put in the link that I started a thread about!
Here it is:
http://makeyourownthen.tumblr.com/
Quote from: ZippoCreed on 26 March, 2012, 08:47:43 PM
What, me declaring myself as an arse or my comment on the writer/artist ratio?
Quote"If you are spending hours writing or reading fanfic, you COULD be making comics. If you are spending hours doing fanart, you COULD be making comics." -- Gail Simone
Quote from: ZippoCreed on 26 March, 2012, 09:24:20 PM
Years ago, I saw an painting in a magazine (I think it may have been Starlog) that totally blew me away. It had a figure, in full Invisible Man garb - trench coat, fedora shades and bandages - walking past a neon - lit peep show joint. Some of the bandages had come away to reveal a feminine hand. I've no idea as to the artist or a title. I've tried looking online but to no avail. Perhaps the mighty, all - seeing Hivemind can assist me?
Quote from: JOE SOAP on 26 March, 2012, 07:02:10 PMQuote from: Emperor on 24 March, 2012, 07:28:26 PM
A tribute from Henry Flint:
http://forbiddenplanet.co.uk/blog/2012/for-brett-ewins-from-henry-flint/
That's beautiful.
Quotehe was the first professional to contact me when I was 17, 5 years before getting my first break. Thanks for the encouragement, Brett.
Quote from: TordelBack on 26 March, 2012, 03:43:35 PMQuote from: Emperor on 26 March, 2012, 03:29:31 PM
Also that tourism revenue wouldn't be diminished if they were mere figureheads with no constitutional role.
I'm not sure this is entirely true. There are plenty of royal dynasties cluttering up Europe, but none with the international prominence or cachet of the UK's - due in part I suspect to their ongoing relevance in the state's business, and the perceived quaintness thereof.
Quote from: JayzusB.Christ on 26 March, 2012, 03:49:01 PMIt's purely idealogical really, and admittedly there are no real practical benefits of being a citizen for the average person.
QuoteIf you've ever dithered over the question of whether the UK needs a written constitution, dither no longer. Imagine the clauses required to preserve the status of the Corporation. "The City of London will remain outside the authority of parliament. Domestic and foreign banks will be permitted to vote as if they were human beings, and their votes will outnumber those cast by real people. Its elected officials will be chosen from people deemed acceptable by a group of medieval guilds ...".
Quote from: The Cosh on 26 March, 2012, 02:18:11 PMQuote from: TordelBack on 26 March, 2012, 01:49:15 PMHowever purely symbolic or ceremonial they actually are I still can't accept the argument that tourism revenue is any basis for a system of government. After all, plenty of people still visit the Palace of Versailles.
All that said, I think the UK monarchy is presently an asset for that state. While I wouldn't cross the street to gawp at them myself, the royals represent in physical form a long history and elaborate, colourful traditions, that help define national identity and international perception (from a cultural impact an tourism point of view).
Quote from: Onlyverysmall on 25 March, 2012, 11:29:01 PM
In terms of Question 8, I've always been under the impression that Viz way outsells The Beano, The Dandy and 2000ad multiple times, hence those crappy Viz copiers years ago; Smut and Zit are all I remember.
Quote from: House of Usher on 26 March, 2012, 12:17:02 AM
I noticed today that this has been picked up by the psychology-lite glossy magazine, 'Psychologies' (it sits on the shelf nestled between 'Predictions' magazine and 'Soul & Spirit'). The line they are going with on the cover is 'at last, the introverts are winning,' but it isn't clear from the article inside in what way exactly.
Quote from: Mikey on 25 March, 2012, 09:06:55 PMThis might not be the most exciting thing on the thread (duh!) - how to compare with wanking gauntlets and jaw dropping star fields? - but it's one of those things that keeps me interested in Stuff, and beats working.