Review of Batman #17 in the Guardian.

[Colin YNWA]

Well, well, well that's a bit if a step forward. I've not seen this before and so apologise if this is just me, but tosl

[Colin YNWA]

Right I'll try again, doing this on my phone and tge modify timed out before I'd sorted it out.

Basically there's a great review (even mentions our own Nemesis) of the latest Batman comic in todays Guardian (Sat 23rd Feb) , well it covers the whole arc really. Not a trade, not a graphic novel, just a plain old mainstream floppie.

Its a good, full page review as well, not an embarrassed after thought. Seems like a step forward to me?

That said more but doing this twice on the phone is doing my head in!

[Frank]

http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2013/feb/14/comics-fiction?INTCMP=SRCH

Thanks for the find, Colin. Someone at The Guardian's writing their comic purchases off as a business expense.

[Professor Bear]

A bizarre choice of comic to pick to review in isolation given the many better books on the shelves right now, but I must say if he thinks that story was Booker material it explains why all them boffins keep complaining about the choice of winners.

[sheldipez]

Great news Batman #17 has got some mainstream UK press attention, very cool.

[Colin YNWA]

Might be worth noting (and someone with the paper double checking) but that online review is significantly to the one in the paper though some elements survive.

[I, Cosh]

Might be worth noting (and someone with the paper double checking) but that online review is significantly [...] to the one in the paper though some elements survive.

Assume the crucial missing word is "different." Yes, quite significantly.

[Colin YNWA]

Whoops, even by my standards I'm on form today!